It had not been forbidden in the US Constitution.
expansionists
Panama Canal zone and Alaska.
It is 260,558 square miles including overseas possessions.
No. That was why he was keen to be nominated as Edward the Confessor's heir, and invaded England when he was overlooked.
None. Mexico is an independent country, and no longer has any territory or overseas possessions.
The nation had overseas possessions it intended to keep
The acquisition of overseas possessions by the U.S. can be viewed from multiple perspectives. Proponents argue that it expanded American influence, provided strategic military and economic advantages, and facilitated access to resources and markets. Critics, however, contend that such actions often disregarded the sovereignty and rights of local populations, leading to conflicts and ethical dilemmas. Ultimately, whether it was justified depends on the balance of these historical consequences and ethical considerations.
Guadeloupe and other overseas French possessions have the very same laws than mainland France.
In the late 1800s, proponents of U.S. acquisition of overseas possessions argued that it was essential for expanding trade and economic interests, particularly in Asia and the Pacific. They believed that establishing coaling stations and naval bases would enhance national security and promote American influence globally. Additionally, the ideology of Manifest Destiny was invoked, suggesting that it was America's duty to spread democracy and civilization to other parts of the world. This combination of economic, strategic, and ideological motivations drove the push for overseas expansion during that period.
Panama Canal zone and Alaska.
cuba
cuba