answersLogoWhite

0

no. Russia did not favour Nicholas because of the effects of the world war on Russia and by taking over as commander in chief he was putting all the blame of the war on him. all the casualties, lack of supplies and economic faliure was on him.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

That Czar Nicholas IIs decision to take over as commander in chief of the Russian army was wise?

Czar Nicholas II's decision to take over as commander in chief of the Russian army was not widely regarded as wise, as it led to direct accountability for military failures during World War I. His lack of military experience and the challenges faced by the Russian forces exacerbated the situation, ultimately contributing to the public discontent and revolutionary sentiments. The decision also diverted attention from domestic issues, further undermining his authority and stability in Russia. Overall, it was a miscalculated move that intensified the crises facing his regime.


What did Nicholas ii do in the military?

Nicholas II, the last Emperor of Russia, served as the commander-in-chief of the Russian Armed Forces during World War I. His decision to take direct control of the military in 1915 was controversial and coincided with significant Russian military failures, leading to widespread dissatisfaction among the populace. His leadership during the war ultimately contributed to the collapse of the Russian Empire and the rise of the Bolsheviks. Nicholas II’s military involvement was marked by a lack of effective strategy and poor decision-making, which exacerbated the hardships faced by Russian soldiers and civilians alike.


According to section 2 of article 2 the president has what position over the armed forces?

He is the Commander-In-Chief. The ultimate decision maker of our armed forces.


Which is correct Commander in chief or Commander and Chief?

"commander-in-chief" is what you are looking for.


Is the president the ultimate decision maker in military matters?

Yes , the US President is also the Commander in Chief .


What is the presidents official military title?

Commander-in-chief commander in chief of the armed forces.


Why is the term commander in chief and not Commander-in-chief?

commander-in-chief is a compound word meaning the highest ranking commander-- it is just one position. Commander and chief would indicate two separate functions and positions.


Who is the commander in the chief of the US Armed Force?

I think you mean "commander in chief"-- this is another expression that describes the President of the United States. The president is the commander in chief of the U.S. military. This means he makes the decision when to go to war, and the leading generals of all the armed forces (Army, Navy, Marines, etc) report to the president.


Which office holds the title of Commander-in-Chief?

The President of the US is the Commander-in-Chief. Currently, President Obama is Commander-in-Chief.


Which office holds the title of commander -in-chief?

The President of the US is the Commander-in-Chief. Currently, President Obama is Commander-in-Chief.


Which office hold the title of commander-in-chief?

The President of the US is the Commander-in-Chief. Currently, President Obama is Commander-in-Chief.


What authority does the president have over the military?

Commander-In-Chief