The Federalist Party believed in a strong national (federal) government with powers over the state governments. The Democratic-Republicans believed that states should have more power than the national government. This is known as the States' Rights theory.
The federalists sent out the Federalists papers in which the people somewhat agreed with the constitution after some states disagreed with it.
Anti-Federalists and Federalists both sought to shape the future of the United States but held opposing views on the balance of power between the federal and state governments. Both groups were concerned about the protection of individual rights and the structure of government, though they disagreed on the extent of federal authority. Additionally, both played crucial roles in the ratification debates of the U.S. Constitution, with Federalists advocating for a stronger central government and Anti-Federalists pushing for more power to remain with the states and the inclusion of a Bill of Rights. Ultimately, their debates laid the foundation for the political landscape of the nation.
they disagreed with thomas because federalist wanted to build a stronger more controlling government.....when thomas a democratic republican(nothing like republicans today.) wanted to keep the constitution in control and the freedom to the people.
the answer is the federalists
The Federalists were better organizes and had more experience. Novanet :)
The main issue that the federalists and anti-federalists disagreed upon was the Bill of Rights. The federalists believed that the people should just have the constitution, however the anti-federalists believed in making a bill of rights so the people could see what there rights were.
The federalists and the anti-federalists mainly disagreed over the amount of control over the states that the federal government would have. The anti-federalists wanted more independence for the states.
The federalist and anti-federalist disagreed on the type of government that they wanted.
The federalists sent out the Federalists papers in which the people somewhat agreed with the constitution after some states disagreed with it.
they strongly disagreed about the national government
Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists believed in the importance of protecting individual liberties and limiting the power of government. They disagreed on how to achieve this goal, with Federalists advocating for a strong central government and Anti-Federalists favoring more power for the states.
Whether a Bill of Rights was necessary to include in the Constitution.
The division of power between the national government and the states.
The main disagreement was the issue of a strong federal government, supported by Federalists, or a weak federal government with strong state government or rights, which was supported by anti-federalists, hence the name. But more importantly, while Anti-Federalists strongly disagreed with a federal government they would concede to it if a Bill of Rights was attached, to protect the people from potential tyranny.
Anti-Federalists and Federalists both sought to shape the future of the United States but held opposing views on the balance of power between the federal and state governments. Both groups were concerned about the protection of individual rights and the structure of government, though they disagreed on the extent of federal authority. Additionally, both played crucial roles in the ratification debates of the U.S. Constitution, with Federalists advocating for a stronger central government and Anti-Federalists pushing for more power to remain with the states and the inclusion of a Bill of Rights. Ultimately, their debates laid the foundation for the political landscape of the nation.
Federalists, like Alexander Hamilton wanted to support England, wanted a strong powerful government, a national bank and a loose interpretation of the Coast. On the other hand, Democratic-Republicans disagreed. They wanted to support France, wanted a small federal government, no national bank and a strict interpretation of the Coast.
Federalists, like Alexander Hamilton wanted to support England, wanted a strong powerful government, a national bank and a loose interpretation of the Coast. On the other hand, Democratic-Republicans disagreed. They wanted to support France, wanted a small federal government, no national bank and a strict interpretation of the Coast.