Providing an up or down vote on slavery.
Probably the destruction of the twin towers, but that sort of thing is always a matter of opinion.
Mom and Dad Her children Her husbands
Not that different from North America
there were presidios missions and settlement and lots of people there
They put together an "Exhibit of American Negroes" to showcase African American scholarship and life in America.
Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it sought to ban slavery in territories acquired from Mexico, threatening the balance of power between free and slave states. They believed that prohibiting slavery in these new territories would undermine their economic interests and political influence. Additionally, many slaveholders viewed the expansion of slavery as a fundamental right and integral to their way of life, seeing the Proviso as an attack on their livelihood and social order.
Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it sought to prohibit slavery in the newly acquired territories from the Mexican-American War. They saw it as a threat to their way of life and ability to expand slavery into new territories. Additionally, they believed it violated their property rights.
Southern politicians opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it aimed to ban slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico, which they viewed as a direct threat to their economic interests and way of life. They believed that the expansion of slavery was essential for the agricultural economy of the South. Additionally, Southerners feared that the Proviso would upset the balance of power between free and slave states in Congress, jeopardizing their political influence. This opposition highlighted the growing sectional tensions that eventually contributed to the Civil War.
Southern politicians opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it sought to ban slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico, threatening the balance of power between free and slave states. They viewed the proviso as an attack on their rights and way of life, fearing it would undermine the institution of slavery integral to their economy. Additionally, they believed that the decision to allow or prohibit slavery in new territories should be left to the settlers themselves, aligning with the principle of popular sovereignty.
The Wilmot Proviso, introduced in 1846, aimed to ban slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico, which alarmed Southern states that sought to expand slavery into new territories. Its passage in the House but failure in the Senate highlighted the deepening sectional divide, as it was seen as a direct threat to the Southern way of life and their political power. This controversy intensified debates over states' rights and the expansion of slavery, ultimately contributing to the growing animosity between the North and the South leading up to the Civil War.
Probably the destruction of the twin towers, but that sort of thing is always a matter of opinion.
Yes, it is correct to say that something impacted someone's life. When you say "impacted on someone's life," you are emphasizing the effect that something had on that person's life.
It has not really impacted it much.
They have impacted life by being able to wash dishes without using the sink.
a lot
The ability to drill oil has made the American economy and infrastructure what it is today. Everything that moves, seemingly is powered ultimately by oil.
he poops