Slaves in the Southern United States. It said that every slave counted as 3/5 of a person, so slave states had more representation in Congress.
Compromising with a group involves finding a middle ground where each member's needs and concerns are acknowledged and addressed. It requires open communication, active listening, and a willingness to adjust one's position for the sake of group harmony. Effective compromise fosters collaboration and strengthens relationships, as it demonstrates respect for diverse perspectives while working toward a common goal. Ultimately, the aim is to achieve a solution that, while not perfect for everyone, is acceptable to all.
i had the same quesiton
The Connecticut compromise is the same exact thing as the great compromise its just another name for it. so the Connecticut compromise/ the great compromise is when the larger states wanted the representatives to be determined on population and the smaller states wanted the representatives to be determined on equality/ equal amount of people on each side for representatives. so they came up with The House of Representatives and the Senate to solve the problem. The great compromise solved a lot of problems and issues that people had.
IT IS A CONFLICT AND COMPROMISE BECAUSE THEY SOLD SLAVES FOR SUGR AND SOME PEOPLE DIDNT AGREE WITH THIS.
They learned about freedom, cooperation, and compromise
allowed the slave states to count a slave as three-fifths of a person
The Three-Fifths Compromise determined how population would be counted for....? Representation in Congress and also direct taxes on the population of the states.
The Mephistopheles group of men came up with the compromise of 1877. This was back in history.
democracy "is government by the people in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents
Missouri Compromise
By using the 3/5ths compromise.Only counting 3 out 5 slaves to be counted as 1.
The compromise of 1850
The advantage of a political group is that it aligns people who share views on policy, and gives them strength in numbers. A disadvantage is when people become so entrenched in their views they are unwilling to compromise for the greater good.
Yes, compromise can help promote group harmony by allowing all individuals to have a voice and feel heard. It demonstrates respect for differing opinions and fosters collaboration towards a common goal.
The disadvantages are that it often takes a long time to reach a group consensus and that group members may have to compromise in order to reach a consensus.
Married People - 1990 Compromise - 1.13 was released on: USA: 19 December 1990
Compromising with a group involves finding a middle ground where each member's needs and concerns are acknowledged and addressed. It requires open communication, active listening, and a willingness to adjust one's position for the sake of group harmony. Effective compromise fosters collaboration and strengthens relationships, as it demonstrates respect for diverse perspectives while working toward a common goal. Ultimately, the aim is to achieve a solution that, while not perfect for everyone, is acceptable to all.