The disadvantages are that it often takes a long time to reach a group consensus and that group members may have to compromise in order to reach a consensus.
individual. It takes too much time for a group to reach a decision.
umm picklee.....
there is more input and therefore more possible solutions to the situation can be generated. Another advantage is that there is shared responsibility for the decision and its outcome, so one person does not have total responsibility for making a decision
Group decision-making can enhance the quality of decisions by incorporating diverse perspectives and expertise, leading to more innovative solutions. However, it also poses challenges for managers, such as the potential for groupthink, where conformity may suppress dissenting opinions. Managers must facilitate effective communication and ensure that all voices are heard while balancing the need for timely decision-making. Ultimately, successful group decision-making can foster team cohesion and commitment to the chosen course of action.
DSS (Decision Support System) and GDSS (Group Decision Support System) are designed specifically to facilitate and enhance decision-making processes. ESS (Executive Support System) also supports decision-making but focuses more on high-level strategic decisions for executives. Therefore, the option "All of the above" is incorrect, as each system mentioned does support decision-making in some capacity.
slowness of the decision-making process
ME
An individual decision is a decision that was made by one person. A group decision is a decision that was crafted by multiple people.
discuss some strengths and weaknesses of group decision-making
factors that make group communication and decision-making effective?
You share decision making and profits in a partnership.
Individual decision making involves one person making a decision based on their own preferences, beliefs, and information. Group decision making involves multiple people collaborating to reach a decision through discussion, negotiation, and compromise. The key differences lie in the diversity of perspectives, potential for conflict, and time required in group decision making compared to individual decision making. Group decision making can lead to more thorough consideration of options and better outcomes, but it can also be slower and more complex due to the need for consensus.
An individual decision is a decision that was made by one person. A group decision is a decision that was crafted by multiple people.
its stipid qestion jo dik khato
Michael J. Saks has written: 'Social psychology and its applications' -- subject(s): Social psychology 'Small-group decision making and complex information tasks' -- subject(s): Decision making, Group decision making, Jury
delphi approach
A strength of group decision making is the diversity of perspectives it brings, allowing for a more comprehensive analysis of problems and potential solutions. This collective input can lead to more creative ideas and better-informed decisions, as group members can challenge each other's assumptions and provide valuable insights. Additionally, group decision making can enhance buy-in and commitment to the final decision, as participants feel a sense of ownership over the outcome.