individual. It takes too much time for a group to reach a decision.
umm picklee.....
there is more input and therefore more possible solutions to the situation can be generated. Another advantage is that there is shared responsibility for the decision and its outcome, so one person does not have total responsibility for making a decision
The disadvantages are that it often takes a long time to reach a group consensus and that group members may have to compromise in order to reach a consensus.
parliamentary procedure
An individual decision is a decision that was made by one person. A group decision is a decision that was crafted by multiple people.
discuss some strengths and weaknesses of group decision-making
Involving more people in the decision-making process can greatly improve the quality of a manager’s decisions and outcomes. However, involving more people can also increase conflict and generate other challenges. We turn now to the advantages and disadvantages of group decision-making.
factors that make group communication and decision-making effective?
Individual decision making involves one person making a decision based on their own preferences, beliefs, and information. Group decision making involves multiple people collaborating to reach a decision through discussion, negotiation, and compromise. The key differences lie in the diversity of perspectives, potential for conflict, and time required in group decision making compared to individual decision making. Group decision making can lead to more thorough consideration of options and better outcomes, but it can also be slower and more complex due to the need for consensus.
An individual decision is a decision that was made by one person. A group decision is a decision that was crafted by multiple people.
its stipid qestion jo dik khato
The stakeholder concept suggests that the managers of a business should take into account their responsibilities to other groups - not just the shareholder group - when making decisions. The concept suggests that businesses can benefit significantly from cooperating with stakeholder groups, incorporating their needs in the decision-making process.
Michael J. Saks has written: 'Social psychology and its applications' -- subject(s): Social psychology 'Small-group decision making and complex information tasks' -- subject(s): Decision making, Group decision making, Jury
The stakeholder concept suggests that the managers of a business should take into account their responsibilities to other groups - not just the shareholder group - when making decisions. The concept suggests that businesses can benefit significantly from cooperating with stakeholder groups, incorporating their needs in the decision-making process.
delphi approach
Affiliated Managers Group was created in 1980.