0
The treatment slaves received depended on the personality of the individual owner not the slave codes?
FALSE
Slave codes were laws and generally had nothing to do with how a slave owner treated the slaves. Most people who owned slaves saw them as property and so 's they treated them as property. Slavery in it's self is wrong and this was true with American slavery. The American form of slavery was very cruel because it not only enslaved people but took away every thing that they were. Their name, language, religion, and culture was taken from them.
What else can I help you with?
What were the war captives made into in ancient rome?
Most war captives were enslaved. Their fate depended upon their attitudes. If they were belligerent or rebellious, they were either sent to a gladiatorial school or used in farming or the mines. Treatment in these places was brutal. However if they accepted their situation they received better treatment, better owners, and the opportunity to work their way out of slavery.
Which US President's election depended upon the vote of the House of Representatives?
Thomas Jefferson 1801 (after a tie vote with Aaron Burr JQ Adams 1825 (after none of the four candidates received an Electoral College majority)
Were convicts given free land grants in Australia?
Yes. Convicts were awarded an amount of land after they received their ticket of leave or free pardon. The size of the land depended on which colony they lived in, and the size also changed through the years.
What did Roman soldiers used to get paid with during the Roman empire?
It all depended upon the times. In addition to their regular pay they shared in the loot from their conquests and if their general were awarded a triumph or ovation, they also received a bonus from him. At retirement, he was either awarded land or a cash bonus, this also depended upon the times. A foreigner, was granted Roman citizenship upon retirement in addition to his cash bonus. The Romans also had a mandatory saving plan for their soldiers. A part of all the soldier's loot or bonus was saved for him and given to him upon retirement. This served a double purpose. It prevented a man from spending all he had as soon as he received it, and it also served as a deterrent for desertion. If a man deserted, he lost everything.It all depended upon the times. In addition to their regular pay they shared in the loot from their conquests and if their general were awarded a triumph or ovation, they also received a bonus from him. At retirement, he was either awarded land or a cash bonus, this also depended upon the times. A foreigner, was granted Roman citizenship upon retirement in addition to his cash bonus. The Romans also had a mandatory saving plan for their soldiers. A part of all the soldier's loot or bonus was saved for him and given to him upon retirement. This served a double purpose. It prevented a man from spending all he had as soon as he received it, and it also served as a deterrent for desertion. If a man deserted, he lost everything.It all depended upon the times. In addition to their regular pay they shared in the loot from their conquests and if their general were awarded a triumph or ovation, they also received a bonus from him. At retirement, he was either awarded land or a cash bonus, this also depended upon the times. A foreigner, was granted Roman citizenship upon retirement in addition to his cash bonus. The Romans also had a mandatory saving plan for their soldiers. A part of all the soldier's loot or bonus was saved for him and given to him upon retirement. This served a double purpose. It prevented a man from spending all he had as soon as he received it, and it also served as a deterrent for desertion. If a man deserted, he lost everything.It all depended upon the times. In addition to their regular pay they shared in the loot from their conquests and if their general were awarded a triumph or ovation, they also received a bonus from him. At retirement, he was either awarded land or a cash bonus, this also depended upon the times. A foreigner, was granted Roman citizenship upon retirement in addition to his cash bonus. The Romans also had a mandatory saving plan for their soldiers. A part of all the soldier's loot or bonus was saved for him and given to him upon retirement. This served a double purpose. It prevented a man from spending all he had as soon as he received it, and it also served as a deterrent for desertion. If a man deserted, he lost everything.It all depended upon the times. In addition to their regular pay they shared in the loot from their conquests and if their general were awarded a triumph or ovation, they also received a bonus from him. At retirement, he was either awarded land or a cash bonus, this also depended upon the times. A foreigner, was granted Roman citizenship upon retirement in addition to his cash bonus. The Romans also had a mandatory saving plan for their soldiers. A part of all the soldier's loot or bonus was saved for him and given to him upon retirement. This served a double purpose. It prevented a man from spending all he had as soon as he received it, and it also served as a deterrent for desertion. If a man deserted, he lost everything.It all depended upon the times. In addition to their regular pay they shared in the loot from their conquests and if their general were awarded a triumph or ovation, they also received a bonus from him. At retirement, he was either awarded land or a cash bonus, this also depended upon the times. A foreigner, was granted Roman citizenship upon retirement in addition to his cash bonus. The Romans also had a mandatory saving plan for their soldiers. A part of all the soldier's loot or bonus was saved for him and given to him upon retirement. This served a double purpose. It prevented a man from spending all he had as soon as he received it, and it also served as a deterrent for desertion. If a man deserted, he lost everything.It all depended upon the times. In addition to their regular pay they shared in the loot from their conquests and if their general were awarded a triumph or ovation, they also received a bonus from him. At retirement, he was either awarded land or a cash bonus, this also depended upon the times. A foreigner, was granted Roman citizenship upon retirement in addition to his cash bonus. The Romans also had a mandatory saving plan for their soldiers. A part of all the soldier's loot or bonus was saved for him and given to him upon retirement. This served a double purpose. It prevented a man from spending all he had as soon as he received it, and it also served as a deterrent for desertion. If a man deserted, he lost everything.It all depended upon the times. In addition to their regular pay they shared in the loot from their conquests and if their general were awarded a triumph or ovation, they also received a bonus from him. At retirement, he was either awarded land or a cash bonus, this also depended upon the times. A foreigner, was granted Roman citizenship upon retirement in addition to his cash bonus. The Romans also had a mandatory saving plan for their soldiers. A part of all the soldier's loot or bonus was saved for him and given to him upon retirement. This served a double purpose. It prevented a man from spending all he had as soon as he received it, and it also served as a deterrent for desertion. If a man deserted, he lost everything.It all depended upon the times. In addition to their regular pay they shared in the loot from their conquests and if their general were awarded a triumph or ovation, they also received a bonus from him. At retirement, he was either awarded land or a cash bonus, this also depended upon the times. A foreigner, was granted Roman citizenship upon retirement in addition to his cash bonus. The Romans also had a mandatory saving plan for their soldiers. A part of all the soldier's loot or bonus was saved for him and given to him upon retirement. This served a double purpose. It prevented a man from spending all he had as soon as he received it, and it also served as a deterrent for desertion. If a man deserted, he lost everything.
What was the difference between Australian POW's caught by the Japanese and POW's caught by the Germans?
Japanese treatment of POW's was far more brutal when compared to German treatment of POWs (bear in mind, Aussies were not of the same ethnicity as Pole or Russian soldiers, who received the worst treatment from Germans). Japan used POWs for slave labor (eg:Burma-Thai Railroad, "Bridge over River Kwai") and were subjected to vivisections, experiments, and overall barbaric treatment. A simple statistic illustrates the difference most clearly. 98% of POWs returned from German POW camps 73% returned from Japanese camps.
The treatment slaves received depended on the personality of the individual owner not the slave codes.?
FALSE Slave codes were laws and generally had nothing to do with how a slave owner treated the slaves. Most people who owned slaves saw them as property and so 's they treated them as property. Slavery in it's self is wrong and this was true with American slavery. The American form of slavery was very cruel because it not only enslaved people but took away every thing that they were. Their name, language, religion, and culture was taken from them.
What were the war captives made into in ancient rome?
Most war captives were enslaved. Their fate depended upon their attitudes. If they were belligerent or rebellious, they were either sent to a gladiatorial school or used in farming or the mines. Treatment in these places was brutal. However if they accepted their situation they received better treatment, better owners, and the opportunity to work their way out of slavery.
Did ancient roman slaves get education?
It would depend upon the individual gladiator. Some were prisoners of war and they could very well have come from wealthy families who were able to afford to educate them, others were possibly not well educated slaves or lower classed people. All gladiators were well educated in their craft and thoroughly trained before going into the arena.
What are the ratings and certificates for Personality - 1967?
Personality - 1967 is rated/received certificates of: USA:TV-PG
What are the ratings and certificates for Personality Parade - 1938?
Personality Parade - 1938 is rated/received certificates of: USA:Approved
What is the average treatment effect on the treated individuals in the study?
The average treatment effect on the treated individuals in the study refers to the impact of the treatment on those who actually received it. It measures the difference in outcomes between those who received the treatment and those who did not.
What is the average treatment effect on the treated individuals in this study?
The average treatment effect on the treated individuals in this study refers to the impact of the treatment on those who actually received it. It measures the difference in outcomes between those who received the treatment and those who did not.
Who received the worsted treatment in the Holocaust?
Jews
In an experiment the group that received no treatment is called a?
In such cases the group is called the control group.
have you received the silent treatment is a question you can ask to assess for?
hi
Who famous German Personality received the 1999 nobel prize for literature?
Guenter Grass
What are the ratings and certificates for The Flintstones - 1960 The Split Personality 1-5?
The Flintstones - 1960 The Split Personality 1-5 is rated/received certificates of: Australia:G
