0
To what extent has power shifted away from federal government towards the states in the last 25 years in the USA?
I am in agreement. The Federal government has extrapolated its authority over the states. The fact that the Federal government can step in and cease or regulate state-run-agencies is proof. State's Rights has diminished much more greatly than ever, probably in the last 2-3 decades. The states are their own sovereign power, so to speak, they are ultimately regulated by a higher authority--the Federal government. As far as i can tell the states have lost some of their power not the federal government.
What else can I help you with?
Belief that the power of the states should be greater than the power of the federal government?
The federal government and the state arises as a result of a consensus reached by various geographically separate regions to be governed by one authority called federalism. Thus making the federal government the overall head and consequently superior in policy making and implementation. Though the states may be autonomous to some extent, it is accountable to the federal government.
Can the federal government intervene in the affairs of native Americans on reservation?
Yes, the federal government can intervene in the affairs of Native Americans on reservations, as it holds a unique trust responsibility towards tribes. This relationship is established through treaties, laws, and Supreme Court decisions that recognize tribal sovereignty while also allowing federal oversight in areas like law enforcement, education, and health services. However, the extent of federal intervention can vary, and tribes often have the authority to govern their internal affairs independently.
What happened in court and what effect did it have Richards attitude towards his father?
In court, Richards faced the harsh reality of his father's actions and the consequences that followed, which deepened his sense of betrayal and anger. The proceedings revealed the extent of his father's failures and moral shortcomings, leading Richards to reassess his feelings towards him. As a result, Richards' attitude shifted from a desire for reconciliation to a profound disappointment, ultimately solidifying a rift in their relationship. This experience left him feeling more isolated and conflicted about his familial ties.
What extent was the resettlement of the native Americans by the federal government just or unjust?
The resettlement of Native Americans by the federal government is widely regarded as unjust due to its coercive nature and the violation of treaties. Indigenous peoples were forcibly removed from their ancestral lands, leading to significant loss of culture, community, and life. This policy was driven by economic interests and expansionist ideologies, disregarding the sovereignty and rights of Native American tribes. Overall, the resettlement can be seen as a manifestation of systemic injustice and colonialism.
What idea did the supporters of the states' rights doctrine promote?
The fundamental idea behind the "State's Rights" movement is that the United States is really a Confederation, not a Federation. The difference is subtle, but very important. In a Federation, ultimate sovereignty is held at the national level, by the national government. That is, all parts of the nation owe sovereignty to the nation as a whole. In a federation, ultimate power rests at the national government level; while it is possible to delegate responsibilities (and authority), to other entities, the legal power to delegate sits with the federal government. In a Confederations, the nation is composed of smaller sovereign states, which consent to form a larger union. Thus, individuals owe sovereign allegiance to their state, not the national government. To the extent that the federal government has power, it is granted that power by the permission of the states making up the confederation, and such power can be revoked by any state not extending the federal government such permission. In the United States prior to the US Civil War, the States Rights movement advocated the idea that the US was really a Confederation. The Civil War definitively settled this issue: the US is legally a Federation. Post-Civil War, the States Rights' movement has adopted a less absolute position, in that while they recognize the Federal Government as absolute (and that the US is indeed a Federation), they advocate that significant powers were strictly delegated to the states by the US Constitution (which is the document that defines the limits of the US government's powers). In particular, while recognizing Article VI (supremacy of the Federal government), they advocate that significant laws and regulations undertaken by the Federal government actually violate Article IV (states' powers and rights).
Belief that the power of the states should be greater than the power of the federal government?
The federal government and the state arises as a result of a consensus reached by various geographically separate regions to be governed by one authority called federalism. Thus making the federal government the overall head and consequently superior in policy making and implementation. Though the states may be autonomous to some extent, it is accountable to the federal government.
Can the federal government intervene in the affairs of native Americans on reservation?
Yes, the federal government can intervene in the affairs of Native Americans on reservations, as it holds a unique trust responsibility towards tribes. This relationship is established through treaties, laws, and Supreme Court decisions that recognize tribal sovereignty while also allowing federal oversight in areas like law enforcement, education, and health services. However, the extent of federal intervention can vary, and tribes often have the authority to govern their internal affairs independently.
Who is the leader of government in the US?
To the extent that there is a single leader of the US government, the President, as head of the Executive branch of the government, is the leader. Because the US federal government is divided into three equal branches, it could be argued that there is no one leader of the government.
Can the federal government cut off your ssi payments without notice?
Only to the extent that you have read Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970).
Can a federal agency compel a standard on another federal agency?
To some extent, yes.
That the American system favored federal control or what was called big government?
Yes, the American system does favor federal control or big government to some extent. The federal government has authority over certain aspects, such as national defense, foreign policy, and interstate commerce. However, the system also allows for some power to be vested in the states through the principle of federalism, where they have control over issues like education, public health, and criminal justice. It is a balance between federal control and state autonomy.
Which government has more power the state or national?
Of course not! Each state has its own laws, which are independent of federal laws, at least to the extent they do not contradict federal law or violate federally protected rights. The vast majority of state laws are outside the jurisdiction of federal law; the US Constitution grants the federal government only limited scope within states.
To what extent did Ben Chifley achieve his light on the hill during his time on the government?
To what extent did Ben Chifley achieve the "Light on the Hill" in his time in government?
How many branches of government does each state has?
In the United States, most if not all US States have three branches. 1. Executive; 2. Legislative; and 3. Judicial. To a large extent these States have the same functions of the Federal government.
To what extent and for what reasons did the policies of the federal government from 1865 to 1900 violate the principles of laissez-faire?
From 1865 to 1900, federal government policies significantly violated laissez-faire principles by intervening in the economy to promote industrialization and protect certain industries. The establishment of tariffs, subsidies for railroads, and the use of antitrust laws exemplified this interventionism, as the government aimed to stimulate economic growth and address monopolistic practices. Additionally, labor regulations and the suppression of labor strikes reflected a willingness to regulate the market in favor of business interests, contradicting laissez-faire’s emphasis on minimal government interference. Overall, these policies highlighted a shift towards a more active role of government in the economy during this period.
Was Hamilton in agreement with the Original 13th Amendment?
The Original 13th Amendment, proposed in 1861, aimed to prevent the federal government from interfering with slavery in states where it already existed. Alexander Hamilton, a Founding Father and advocate for a strong federal government, did not directly comment on this amendment, as it emerged after his death in 1804. However, Hamilton's views on federal power and individual rights suggest he would have had complex opinions on the issue of slavery and the extent of federal intervention. Ultimately, his legacy reflects a tension between his commitment to a strong central government and the moral implications of slavery.
Who funded the creation of the internet?
The basic infrastructure of the internet was a Federal project that was built by the US military as a communications system. This it later abandoned and it soon became a privately run communications system, to a large extent. The US military no longer uses it for its original purpose. The Federal government, however, has found methods to monitor the activities that are done on the Internet.
