answersLogoWhite

0

It is definitely arguable that he was very unlucky in 1066. He was crowned, firstly, by an archbishop not approved by the pope; archbishop Stigand. With this, William was able to gain papal support and during The Battle of Hastings Williams troops will have had a massive physiological boost knowing that they have a guaranteed place in heaven. Also when he was crowned, due to the many potential other claimants to the throne, invasion of England was impending.

Harold was also unlucky because while waiting for the Normans in the South, the Vikings led by Harald Hardrada and Tostig invaded in the North. Harold had to march up North and defeat them at the Battle of Stamford Bridge. Meanwhile the Normans invaded in the South and they had to march back across the whole country to meet them.

To summate, Harold Godwinsson was not lucky in 1066. If anyone during this era was lucky it was William. To exacerbate this point, the tide preventing William from crossing over to England changed at the perfect time (while Scandinavian invaders where fighting Harold in the North). William was also lucky because he burned the land and if Harold waited and simply held the Normans back the Normans would of had to turn back in order to get food.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?