NO. The Anti-Federalists who opposed the US Constitution were angered that the Constitution gave too little power to the states and too much power to the federal government.
ratification
Delaware was the first state to ratify the United States Constitution, on December 7, 1787. Its ratification was significant because it ensured that the Constitution had the approval of at least nine of the thirteen states, which was the number required for it to go into effect.
Virginia and New York were crucial in the battle for ratification of the Constitution because they were two of the largest and most influential states in the new nation. Their ratification would lend significant legitimacy and support to the Constitution, encouraging other states to follow suit. Additionally, both states had strong anti-Federalist sentiments that raised concerns about centralized power, making their debates and outcomes pivotal in shaping the national conversation around federalism and individual rights. Ultimately, their ratification helped solidify the Constitution's acceptance and implementation.
The U.S. Constitution required the ratification of ten of the thirteen states to go into effect. Eventually all thirteen ratified it.
Contrary to the process for "alteration" spelled out in Article 13 of the Articles of Confederation, Congress submitted the proposal to the states and set the terms for representation. On September 17, 1787, the Constitution was completed in Philadelphia at the Federal Convention, followed by a speech given by Benjamin Franklin who urged unanimity, although they decided they only needed nine states to ratify the constitution for it to go into effect. The Convention submitted the Constitution to the Congress of the Confederation, where it received approval according to Article 13 of the Articles of Confederation, but the resolution of the Congress submitting the Constitution to the states for ratification and agreeing with its provision for implementation upon ratification by nine states is contrary to Article 13, though eventually all thirteen states did ratify the Constitution, albeit after it took effect. After fierce fights over ratification in many of the states, New Hampshire became that ninth state on June 21, 1788. Once the Congress of the Confederation received word of New Hampshire's ratification, it set a timetable for the start of operations under the Constitution, and on March 4, 1789, the government under the Constitution began operations.
It was approval by the states of the constitution.
Ratification of amendments to the Constitution is a power of the?
Opponents of ratifying the Constitution were known as the Anti-Federalists, which included figures like Patrick Henry and George Mason. Their major argument against ratification centered on the fear that the new federal government would be too powerful, undermining states' rights and individual liberties. They also criticized the lack of a Bill of Rights, believing it was essential to protect citizens' freedoms from potential government overreach.
The states would not refuse to ratify the constitution because it gave too much power to the states. By ratifying the constitution, the states were giving up power they had under the articles of confederation. Still, the states realized they needed a national government. The wars between them had to cease. The tariffs between them had to stop. And they needed to stop arguing about their borders. Only a national government could solve such problems.
The states for ratification
Twenty-seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution was submitted to the states by ratification.
the states
ratification
The small states were not against ratification. The small states were the ones who stood to benefit most, so they were in favor of it.
the ratification is important because it is a big part of the united states constitution and America
new hampsire
I believe one argument he made was that there are no provisions for cessation in the Constitution. One problem with the argument is that according to the Constitution any powers not given to the federal government are reserved to the states.