In theory, serfs were supposed to be protected by their lords. This might have meant that in theory, the serfs should not have got involved in wars. Another way of interpreting this theory was that the serfs were to be protected by organizing them for defense. But one way or the other, the serfs got involved in the wars, either as participants or as victims.
There is a link below to the section on serfs' duties in an article on serfdom. According to it, there is some debate on whether serfs could be legally required to fight in combat. My bet is that the laws varied depending on time and place, and that any rule protecting the serfs was bound to be broken as required by the lord.
Tsar Alexander II freed the serfs in Russia in 1861.
Most czars in Russia treated serfs as property rather than as individuals with rights. They imposed harsh conditions, including forced labor and limited freedoms, often subjecting serfs to the whims of their landowners. Reforms, such as the Emancipation Reform of 1861 under Czar Alexander II, aimed to improve their status, but many serfs continued to face economic and social hardships even after being freed. Overall, the treatment of serfs reflected the broader autocratic and feudal nature of Russian society.
No, Catherine the Great did not free the serfs in Russia during her reign.
Catherine the Great's decision to free the serfs in Russia during her reign had a significant impact on the social and economic landscape. The emancipation of the serfs led to increased social mobility and improved living conditions for many peasants. However, it also caused economic challenges for the nobility who relied on serf labor for their estates. Overall, the decision contributed to the modernization of Russia's economy and society.
slaves
the emancipation of russia serfs
Roxanne Easley has written: 'The emancipation of the serfs in Russia' -- subject(s): Emancipation, Arbitrators, Serfs, Civil society
Serfs in Russia were officially freed in 1861 by Tsar Alexander II through the Emancipation Manifesto. The emancipation was part of a series of reforms aimed at modernizing the country and addressing social issues.
set serfs free and gave them land
Tsar Alexander II freed the serfs in Russia in 1861.
Nicolas de Gerebtzoff has written: 'De l'emancipation des serfs en Russie' -- subject(s): Emancipation, Serfs, Russia, Serfdom
There are no serfs in Russia today.
Most czars in Russia treated serfs as property rather than as individuals with rights. They imposed harsh conditions, including forced labor and limited freedoms, often subjecting serfs to the whims of their landowners. Reforms, such as the Emancipation Reform of 1861 under Czar Alexander II, aimed to improve their status, but many serfs continued to face economic and social hardships even after being freed. Overall, the treatment of serfs reflected the broader autocratic and feudal nature of Russian society.
set serfs free and gave them land
When Alexander II freed the serfs (peasants) in Russia in 1861. The serfs were never truly freed. The Russian government bought land from the landowners to give to the serfs, but the serfs were required to repay the Russian government. These repayments took 49 years and the serfs stayed on the land until it was fully repaid.
Serfs were slaves and not a different group of people ( serf is Latin for slave). In the middle ages there was no emancipation for these people.
The czar that freed the serfs in Russia is Alexander the II.