One, the Battle of Fort Stevens, (Early was Late) July 11th 1864. The Confederate Commander Jubal (Jubilee) Early was late and allowed the defenders time to mass Veteran troops. Had Early been on time and attacked first, he would have routed the Union Forces and Washington D.C. would have been captured. It surley might have not been held for any length of time, but then again you just never know, had the President, Congress, and the Senate, been captured as well. It just so happens that President Abe Lincoln was present at the Battle of Fort Stevens and was fired upon by Confederate Sharpshooters, a very interesting story of history, and of how close history might have changed. A picture of Fort Stevens, past and present may be found on Wikipedia
No
No Civil War battles of consecuence were fought in California.
my butt
Yes--Gettysburg, for one.
King George did not take part in any battles himself.
No
no
The Battles of Brandwine and Fort McHenry in the Revolutionary War and the Battle of Antietam in the US Civil War.
no
no but the Sioux uprising of 1862 in Minnesota is considered part of the Civil war,and had several battles.
No Civil War battles of consecuence were fought in California.
yes
Yes, there were naval battles; in fact, the first ironclad ships were invented during the Civil War.
my butt
"Civil War" is a proper noun. So would be any of the names of the battles or the soldiers who fought in them.
George Washington didn't have any descendants.
No all the battles where east of the Mississippi River execpt Texas there was a battle in Texas