answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, there were some Northerners who supported the expansion of slavery into Northern territories like Nebraska, primarily for economic reasons or to appease Southern interests. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which allowed for popular sovereignty to decide the issue of slavery, attracted both pro-slavery advocates and abolitionists to the territories. This led to significant conflict, as both groups sought to influence the outcome, ultimately resulting in violent confrontations known as "Bleeding Kansas." While many Northerners opposed slavery, the political landscape at the time included a contingent that was willing to accommodate its expansion to maintain the Union.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why did some northerners object to dividing the nebraska territory in to?

It would allow slavery to spread north of the line established by the Missouri compromise. - Novanet


Why did some northerners objects to dividing Nebraska territory in two?

It would allow slavery to spread north of the line established by the Missouri compromise. - Novanet


Why did northerners head for Kansas after the signing of the Kansas- Nebraska act?

They got to choose whether the territory would have slavery by the way of popular sovereignty, which is the people get to have the choice.


What was the northern point of view on the Kansas-Nebraska act?

Most Northerners just hoped it would settle the slavery issue through a straight voting decision. But extreme Abolitionists lke John Brown saw it as an opportunity to invade this thinly-populated territory and intimidate the voters.


How did antislavery northerners hope to prevent slavery in Kansas?

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of the U.S. Congress said voters in these territories to choose whether they would allow slavery or not. Thousands of antislavery northerners went into Kansas and voted to forbid slavery, then returned home.


How was the issue of slavery to be decide in Nebraska and Kansas?

In 1854 , Senator Stephen A. Douglas prosposed a bill that would divide the Nebraska territory into two terriotories - Nebraska and Kansas .


Which territories were open to slavery after 1854?

Nebraska Territory and Kansas Territory or you could just look in a textbook


How did the Northern and Southern Democrats differ over the party's platform on slavery in 1860?

The Northern and Southern Democrats differed over the party's platform on slavery in 1860 since the southerners wanted the party to defend slavery in the platform and Northerners wanted the platform to support popular sovereignty as a way of deciding whether a territory became a free state or a slave state.


What is the principle that led to conflict over slavery in Kansas and Nebraska territory?

Popular Sovereignity


Why did some northerners object to dividing the Nebraska in two?

It would allow slavery to spread north of the line established by the Missouri compromise. - Novanet


Why did northern lawmakers try to restrict the south from spreading slavery?

Because most Northerners were against the extension of slavery, though they were prepared to accept it in its traditional heartlands.


What was the first US territory to spill blood in an internal conflict over slavery?

The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act caused an internal conflict. As a territory, Kansas was the first territory to have an armed and bloody conflict over slavery.