answersLogoWhite

0

Some common medieval military terms used to describe tactics and strategies in battle include:

  1. Cavalry - mounted soldiers who fight on horseback
  2. Infantry - foot soldiers who fight on the ground
  3. Siege - a military operation in which an enemy position is surrounded and isolated in order to force surrender
  4. Flanking - attacking the sides of an enemy formation to gain an advantage
  5. Ambush - a surprise attack by hiding and waiting for the enemy to pass by
  6. Shield wall - a defensive formation in which soldiers interlock their shields to create a protective barrier
  7. Feint - a deceptive movement or attack to distract or mislead the enemy
  8. Pincer movement - a tactic in which forces attack the enemy from two sides simultaneously
  9. Sapper - a soldier trained in siege warfare and the construction of fortifications
  10. Skirmish - a small, brief fight between small groups of soldiers.
User Avatar

AnswerBot

5mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What were Germany's military strategies based on?

The fear Germany instilled in their wartime tactics were based on the tactics used by Vlad the Impaler


What is the definition of military tactics?

Military tactics are defined as strategies of organizing the army, ways of using the weapons in the best possible course and to optimize the use of military units in order to be successful in a battle. Military tactics also involve maintenance of equipment and daily training of military units.


How did Alexander's exposure to Airstotle shape his future as a military ruler?

aristole taught alexander tactics along with strategies and how to read and write out his tactics


What are Napoleon Bonaparte's accomplishment?

His tactics and strategies are still studied by military historians and at Military Academies throughout the world but his lasting legacy was the Napoleonic Code.


Why did Sun Tzu write The Art of War?

Sun Tzu wrote The Art of War to provide strategies and tactics for military leaders to achieve victory in battle.


What are the various uses of flamethrowers in modern warfare and how do they impact military tactics and strategies?

Flamethrowers in modern warfare are primarily used for clearing out enemy positions, destroying fortifications, and creating barriers. They can impact military tactics and strategies by providing a powerful and intimidating weapon that can quickly neutralize threats and change the course of a battle. Additionally, the psychological impact of flamethrowers can demoralize enemy forces and disrupt their defenses.


What has the author Arthur L Wagner written?

Arthur L. Wagner has written: 'Organization and tactics' -- subject(s): Military art and science, Tactics 'Questions in organization and tactics' -- subject(s): Military art and science, Tactics 'The service of security and information' -- subject(s): Tactics, Military reconnaissance, Military art and science, Guard duty, Military intelligence


What is the difference between strategies and tactics in sport?

there is no difference.


What was Caesar Augustus' military tactics?

He left the tactics to his admirals and generals.


What military events did military theorist Henri Johmini write about?

Military theorist Henri Jomini completed over twenty seven volumes of work based on the history of warfare and its tactics and strategies. He covered the military events surrounding Napoleon, Frederick the Great along with the wars associated with the French Revolution.


What is an approach a military historian would take to study the Cuban missile crisis?

A historian might describe the tactics the United States might have used to physically destroy the missiles in Cuba.


How did the military tactics and strategies of the Mongols differ from those of the Huns in ancient warfare?

The military tactics and strategies of the Mongols differed from those of the Huns in ancient warfare in several key ways. The Mongols were known for their highly organized and disciplined army, skilled in horseback warfare and using advanced tactics such as feigned retreats and coordinated attacks. In contrast, the Huns relied more on their sheer numbers and speed, utilizing hit-and-run tactics and overwhelming their enemies with sheer force. Additionally, the Mongols were adept at siege warfare and had a more sophisticated command structure, while the Huns were more decentralized and relied on individual leaders for direction.