answersLogoWhite

0

Requiring unanimous consent and 9 out of 13 states to pass a law can lead to gridlock and difficulty in making decisions, as it may be challenging to get all states to agree on a single issue. This can slow down the legislative process and make it harder to address important issues efficiently.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

7mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What power do confederation and federal?

Any amendment required unanimous consent of the states.


What was the problem with requiring a unanimous vote of the states to create changes in the articles of confederation?

Requiring a unanimous vote of the states to make changes to the Articles of Confederation created significant gridlock, as it gave any single state the power to veto proposed amendments, making it extremely difficult to address pressing issues. This requirement often led to inaction and frustration among the states, as differing interests and priorities hindered consensus. Consequently, the inability to adapt the governing framework contributed to weaknesses in the national government, ultimately prompting the need for a new constitution.


Why did the final paragraph in the declaration of independence state done in convention by the unanimous consent of the states present?

The final paragraph of the Declaration of Independence emphasized that the decision to declare independence was made collectively and with unanimous consent of the states present, underscoring the unity and collective will of the colonies. This statement served to legitimize the declaration by demonstrating that it was a joint effort, reinforcing the idea that the colonies stood together against British rule. Additionally, it highlighted the importance of collaboration among the states in pursuing their shared goal of independence.


How many states required approval of the Articles of Confederation?

The Articles of Confederation required approval from all 13 states to be ratified. Each state had to formally consent to the articles for them to take effect, reflecting the need for unanimous agreement among the states in the early years of American governance. This unanimous requirement proved challenging and contributed to the eventual recognition of the need for a stronger federal government, leading to the Constitutional Convention of 1787.


The constitution had to be approved by who?

The Articles of Confederation failed as a form of government for America partly because they granted very few powers to the government, and on top of this they were very difficult to amend. Changing anything about the Articles would require a unanimous vote from all thirteen states.

Related Questions

Required unanimous consent from all states for amendments?

No, consent of at least 75% of the states is required.


What power do confederation and federal?

Any amendment required unanimous consent of the states.


What states require parental consent for abortions?

States Requiring Consent or Notification:AlabamaArizonaArkansasFloridaGeorgiaIndianaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriNebraskaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVirginiaWyoming States requiring just Consent:...States without consent/notification laws:ConnecticutHawaiiNew YorkOregonCaliforniaVermontWashingtonand Washington, D.C.States Requiring Consent or Notification:AlabamaArizonaArkansasFloridaGeorgiaIndianaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriNebraskaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVirginiaWyoming States requiring just Consent:...States without consent/notification laws:ConnecticutHawaiiNew YorkOregonCaliforniaVermontWashingtonand Washington, D.C.These things change all the time so call NARAL to make sure. I know California requires consent or notice now. You can also check yourself at the NARAL site. See link below.


What was the problem with requiring a unanimous vote of the states to create changes in the articles of confederation?

Requiring a unanimous vote of the states to make changes to the Articles of Confederation created significant gridlock, as it gave any single state the power to veto proposed amendments, making it extremely difficult to address pressing issues. This requirement often led to inaction and frustration among the states, as differing interests and priorities hindered consensus. Consequently, the inability to adapt the governing framework contributed to weaknesses in the national government, ultimately prompting the need for a new constitution.


How many states had to approve an amendments to the articles of confederation?

The Articles of Confederation required unanimous consent of the states for an amendment. Two attempts were made to amend the Articles of Confederation, each one failing by one vote.


What states do not require a unanimous verdict in a federal jury trial?

In federal jury trials, a unanimous verdict is required by federal law. However, in state courts, a few states do allow non-unanimous verdicts in certain circumstances. For instance, Louisiana and Oregon previously permitted non-unanimous jury verdicts in felony cases, but changes in state law have since moved towards requiring unanimity. It's important to note that this does not apply to federal trials, where unanimity is mandatory regardless of state practices.


What article of the article of confederation requires that a unanimous consent of the state was needed in order to adopt or ratify an amendment. To the constitution?

The requirement for unanimous consent of the states to adopt or ratify an amendment is found in Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation. This article stipulates that any alteration or amendment to the Articles would require the approval of all thirteen states. This provision made it extremely difficult to amend the Articles, contributing to the eventual decision to draft a new Constitution.


Why did the final paragraph in the declaration of independence state done in convention by the unanimous consent of the states present?

The final paragraph of the Declaration of Independence emphasized that the decision to declare independence was made collectively and with unanimous consent of the states present, underscoring the unity and collective will of the colonies. This statement served to legitimize the declaration by demonstrating that it was a joint effort, reinforcing the idea that the colonies stood together against British rule. Additionally, it highlighted the importance of collaboration among the states in pursuing their shared goal of independence.


How many states required approval of the Articles of Confederation?

The Articles of Confederation required approval from all 13 states to be ratified. Each state had to formally consent to the articles for them to take effect, reflecting the need for unanimous agreement among the states in the early years of American governance. This unanimous requirement proved challenging and contributed to the eventual recognition of the need for a stronger federal government, leading to the Constitutional Convention of 1787.


The constitution had to be approved by who?

The Articles of Confederation failed as a form of government for America partly because they granted very few powers to the government, and on top of this they were very difficult to amend. Changing anything about the Articles would require a unanimous vote from all thirteen states.


Your boyfriend will be 18 when you're 16. Can he get in trouble?

The age of consent for most states is 16 years of age. However, there are a few states where the age of consent is 17. Click on the related links section (age of consent) for a list of states and the policy. I don't see a problem with dating or going steady, it's what happens when things go too far at this age that can present a problem.


Why did the final paragraph of the constitution state done in the convention by the unanimous consent of the states present?

The debates and compromises that went into creating the U.S. Constitution were done at a constitutional convention to which Rhode Island refused to send delegates.