In federal jury trials, a unanimous verdict is required by federal law. However, in state courts, a few states do allow non-unanimous verdicts in certain circumstances. For instance, Louisiana and Oregon previously permitted non-unanimous jury verdicts in felony cases, but changes in state law have since moved towards requiring unanimity. It's important to note that this does not apply to federal trials, where unanimity is mandatory regardless of state practices.
Any amendment required unanimous consent of the states.
It depends on the country, in England and Wales, the judge can instruct the jury that a majority verdict is acceptable if the jury can't reach a unanimous verdict. ANSWER 99.9% of the time, in the US, it has to be unanimous one way or the other or it is a mistrial. There are some states with statutes that allow 9-3, 10-2, or 11-1 either way to be a conviction or acquittal, but for the most part, it has to be 12-0 for guilty or not guilty or it must be redone. Some districts have juries or 6 or 8 for misdemeanors or even felonies. Normally they have to be unanimous, but it depends on the rules of the court. Again 99.9% of the time, it must be unanimous, but there are exceptions.
In United States jurisprudence an Allen Charge is the set of instructions given to a jury when, after deliberation, it reports that it is deadlocked and unable to decide on a verdict. The purpose of the instruction is to encourage jurors to re-examine their opinions and attempt to reach a unanimous verdict if possible
In some (not all) states provisions are made for conducting trials for certain lesser offenses (misdemeanor offenses - civil cases - traffic cases - etc) with either fewer than 12 jurors, or for verdicts that are less than unanimous. In some states minor offenses can be tried with as few as seven jurors, and the verdicts do not necessarily have to be unanimous (e.g.: 5 out of 7 vote guilty, or 8 our of 12 vote guilty). It is a way to shorten the trial process and reduce the strain on the jury pool. However - in capital cases and/or for serious offenses (felonies) the jury will usually always consist of 12 jurors and the verdict must be unanimous.
No. Indeed in Scottish law there is provision for a 3rd outcome: Not Proven. It was once the case that juries had to be unanimous, but now they have majority verdicts. Sometimes a majority decision cannot be reached.
It is a FEDERAL form...most all states follow federal and make some changes.
In the United States, the number of jurors required to impose a death sentence for a first-degree murder conviction varies by state. However, most states require a unanimous jury decision to impose the death penalty. Some states may allow non-unanimous verdicts in certain circumstances, but a unanimous decision is typically seen as a standard requirement for capital cases.
The preceding system of government, The Articles of Confederation, required that the states have a unanimous vote on EVERYTHING. The whole point of the constitution was that it would give the federal government a lot more power and only require a state majority on votes. A lot of people distrusted this idea, and so it was near impossible to get a unanimous vote from states. Thomas Paine, Author of "Common Sense" famously vented his fear and mistrust for a powerful Federal government by announcing "I smell a rat." It took a few years, but eventually the Federalist Party pulled enough weight around and got the states to unanimously vote for a change to the Constitution.
The basic answer is, you can't. In the United States, there is no list. U.S. federal law does not require registration and only a few states require it.
Leave the southern states immediately
Leave the southern states immediately
Federal criminal juries need to reach a unanimous decision, but the courts have ruled that state criminal juries can have less than unanimous. Only two states allow this. Louisiana and Oregon allow 10-2 verdicts.