0
What Evaluating Decisions Did Admiral Mamet Make a Decision In Bombing Pearl Harbor?
Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, not Mamet, was the architect behind the decision to bomb Pearl Harbor. His evaluation focused on a surprise attack to cripple the U.S. Pacific Fleet, enabling Japan to expand its influence in the Pacific without immediate American interference. Yamamoto weighed the risks of a counterattack against the potential gains of disabling American naval power. Ultimately, he believed that a decisive blow could secure Japan's strategic objectives in the region.
What else can I help you with?
Who planned the bombing on pearl Harbor?
Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto
Who was responsible for the surprise attack at Pearl Harbor?
Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, a Japanese admiral, planned the attack on pearl harbor and was in the atack.
Why was the bombing of Japan a difficult decision for Truman?
It was not difficult for Truman. He wanted to end the war and collapse Japan's means to make war.
Was strategic bombing worse than Nazi Death camps?
The total death count from the strategic bombing in ww2 was much lower, but the destruction was much more widespread. I would encourage you to read more about the Strategic bombing during World War II and make those decisions yourself. You can make arguments both ways on what worse really means.
When did Bombing of Cabra happen?
Bombing of Cabra happened in 1938.
Who was the admiral of the American fleet at Pearl Harbor before the bombing?
Admiral Husband E. Kimmel was the Commander at Pearl Harbor prior to Dec 7th bombing
Who planned the bombing on pearl Harbor?
Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto
Who devised the plan for the bombing of Pearl Harbor?
The Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto .
What was the president's rule in the bombing of hiroshima?
It was his decision to go ahead.
Who was responsible for the surprise attack at Pearl Harbor?
Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, a Japanese admiral, planned the attack on pearl harbor and was in the atack.
Why was the bombing of Japan a difficult decision for Truman?
It was not difficult for Truman. He wanted to end the war and collapse Japan's means to make war.
What was Escalation decision making during Vietnam war?
If the North didn't want to talk at the peace table, bombing missions over the North Vietnam were stepped up. If the North conducted large offensive operations in South Vietnam, more bombing. If the North hinted they might want to talk, the bombing might be suspended for awhile.
Why did Admiral Leahy feel the use of the bomb was ethically and morally incorrect?
Admiral Leahy believed that using the atomic bomb was unnecessary and morally wrong because he felt the bombing of civilian populations, particularly in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was excessive and indiscriminate. He also argued that Japan was already on the brink of surrender, making the use of the bomb unnecessary to achieve victory.
Was strategic bombing worse than Nazi Death camps?
The total death count from the strategic bombing in ww2 was much lower, but the destruction was much more widespread. I would encourage you to read more about the Strategic bombing during World War II and make those decisions yourself. You can make arguments both ways on what worse really means.
Did the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki solve any problems?
The decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki did work to have the Japanese surrender without appeasment.
Who was related with the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombing during World War 2?
President Truman took the decision alone but the Canadians scientists help with the research.
What were the effects of the Pearl Harbor bombing?
In the words of Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, who was the genius behind Japan's early naval successes during World War II including the attack at Pearl Harbor, the effect was to "awaken a sleeping giant".
