0
What else can I help you with?
What act or omission is defined as the failure to act as a reasonably prudent and careful person would under similar circumstances?
Nonfeasance
Philip II of Spain was known as what?
Philip II of Spain was known as Philip the Prudent
Why did the Germans attack British ships during the war?
The Allies were the enemies of Germany; attacking them was a prudent act of war.
How can the national dept be eliminated?
No. It can be made smaller with some prudent trimming, but to get rid of it completely is not possible. The country began in debt from the revolution.
What would happen to people who struck it rich in the goldfields?
The could squander it, be robbed and murdered, or as the more prudent did, invest the money in land and property.
What Is the failure to act as the reasonably prudent person would act under similar circumstances?
Negligence
Is the failure to act as a reasonably prudent person would act under similar circumstances?
What helps determine that the voucher has supporting obligation documentations prior to certification
Is the failure to act as a reasonably prudent person would act under similar circumstances according to air force?
Yes, failure to act in a manner consistent with what a reasonably prudent person would do under similar circumstances may be considered a violation of duty or negligence in the Air Force. This principle applies to all service members, who are expected to adhere to high standards of conduct and decision-making in their roles.
What act or omission is defined as the failure to act as a reasonably prudent and careful person would under similar circumstances?
Nonfeasance
What is the definition of standard of care a reasonably prudent individual would exhibit given the same set of circumstances?
The standard of care is the level of care and caution that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances to prevent harm or injury to others. It is used as a benchmark in determining negligence in legal cases.
If two cars collide whose insurance company pays?
The answer depends upon who is legally liable for causing the collision. Legal liability can arise from violation of a statute or ordinance, or from simple negligence. Negligence is basically the failure to exercise that degree of care that a reasonably prudent person would have used under the same or similar circumstances. In some states the doctrine of comparative negligence is used. This means that it is possible for each party to be found to be partially at fault. In such a case, damages are reduced by the degree to which a person is found to be negligent.
Failure to do something that a reasonable person would do under ordinary circumstances that ends up causing harm to another person?
Negligence is when someone fails to take reasonable care or precautions that a prudent person would under similar circumstances, resulting in harm or injury to another individual. It involves a breach of a duty of care owed to the other person.
When a person fails to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk is it called?
When a person fails to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk, it is called "negligence." In legal terms, this refers to a person's inability to exercise the level of care that a reasonably prudent person would in similar circumstances. This lack of awareness can lead to harm or injury to others, establishing liability for the negligent party.
Is the failure to act as a reasonable prudent person would act under similar circumstances?
What helps determine that the voucher has supporting obligation documentations prior to certification
Does the duty of care unfairly burden business owners?
No. In the context of a negligence case, a person (or doctor or business owner or child, etc) is charged with acting reasonably prudent and exercising due care that an average person in the same position would exercise.
What does as soon as reasonably possible mean in an insurance policy?
It pretty much means as it says. Reasonable is defined as what the average person of the general public would deem prudent and commonly acceptable under a given circumstances.
Who is at fault when someone backs into an illegally parked car?
The driver is responsible for the full damages. Your car is motionless. A prudent driver driving reasonably should look into a rear view mirror before backing up. In this case your illegal parking did NOT contribute to the negligence of the driver.
