A slightly inaccurate statement by promoters of the European Theater of Operations during WW2. Historians who make such statements are considering WW2 to be the ETO (European Theater of Operations), while calling the PTO (Pacific Theater of Operations) the "Pacific War." A form of prejudice of one theater over another. Another example is the starting date of WW2. The same historians chose September 1939 as the starting date for WW2; because it happened in Europe. The war started in Europe in 1939; as did the Asian War in China in the 1930's. NEITHER war was a GLOBAL WAR until the US entered it on December 7, 1941. More accurately stated; Adolph Hitler served bravely in the (Austrian/Bavarian) German Army as a messenger (earning the Iron Cross) during WW1. He was wounded in action (gassed) and hospitalized. During which time word of the Armistice reached him. Displeased with the Treaty that ended the war, he vowed to "right it" when he had the chance. When France surrendered in WW2, he ordered the French to signed their surrender in the very same train car that the Germans had to sign in in 1918; and to further the insult, Hitler refused to honor the signing with his presence (he didn't show up for it). So...those historians state that WW2 was just an extension of WW1.
ameriacan writer henry david thoreau, what was he supporting?
i have no idea but i want a taco
i do believe that it would be free speech,",civil disobedience
Jules Rimmet, some french geezer. The first world cup trophy was named after him, although Brazil now own that trophy.
The idea of atomic structure of the world was proposed intuitively by Leukippus and Democritus 2 500 years ago.
The supporting points to your arguments are listed as sub-points of each of your three main arguments. Keep in mind it's an outline so don't go into too much detail.
To support an idea
Problems and nonsense but other than that IDK. --- Actually, good arguments would have a premise and supporting details. The other party would counter you, using logic and supporting details. Then it eventually resolves with either a winner, both sides reaching consensus, or both parties agreeing to disagree and move on.
to give the details or arguments that support the main idea
an idea that supports something
Key supporting points are the main arguments or pieces of evidence that back up a central idea or thesis. They provide context, explanation, or proof to help strengthen the main point being made in a discussion or presentation. Identifying and articulating key supporting points can help to improve the clarity and persuasiveness of your argument.
Main ideas are the primary focus of a piece of writing, supported by major supporting details that provide key information or arguments. Minor supporting details further enhance the major supporting details by offering additional explanations, examples, or evidence that strengthen the main idea. Together, they work to develop a cohesive and well-supported argument or theme in the writing.
Supporting details provide evidence, examples, or explanations that clarify and reinforce the main idea or thesis of a text. They help to illustrate points, making arguments more persuasive and understandable. By offering additional context or specifics, these details enhance the reader's comprehension and engagement with the material.
supporting idea is where we have to explane about the topic like horses
Minor supporting details help to reinforce and expand upon the main ideas or arguments in a piece of writing. They provide specific examples, evidence, or explanations that add depth and credibility to the overall message. Minor supporting details help make the main points more convincing and compelling to the reader.
develops, supports, or explains the main idea of a paragraph
A main idea is not a supporting detail. Main ideas are the central points of a paragraph or passage, while supporting details provide evidence or examples to back up the main idea.