There was a big difference in the rich citizens in ancient Rome, similar to the 1% crisis today. The rich citizens, known as the patricians, made up 10% of the population and had 90% of the wealth. The poor, called plebeians, made up 90% of the population and had 10% of the wealth. The patricians had most rights, whereas the plebeians barely had basic human rights. It wasn't a nice place to be. If you were rich, you didn't have friends. If you were poor, you didn't have an education.
Poor, like today.
Roman
Bread and Circuses.
Diocletian was a Roman Emperor who came from a poor family. After gaining ranks in the Roman Army he eventually became Emperor of the Roman Empire in 284 until 305.
Yes, Christianity did appeal to the poor and powerless in the ancient Roman Empire. It appealed to them because it gave them something to look forward to - the next life in which they would dwell in peace.
Because it did
Poor, like today.
There were parallels between the later Roman Empire and modern industrial countries. There was a great divide between rich and poor. The Roman one percent controlled the wealth, and the poor had to settle for Bread and Circuses to keep them from revolting. Eventually the poor welcomed barbarian invasion over the crippling taxation and unemployment of the Roman Emperors.
That could be the case.....
Food
Roman
An overemphasis on military service. The fall of Christianity. Extremely low inflation.
Bread and Circuses.
The poor gets poorer and the rich gets richer.
The differences between the Plebeians and Patricians were the differences between the rich and the poor. So yes, these differences still exist in all countries all over the world.
Because Rome started becoming poor and kept on being attacked
There were differences in the way the rich and the poor made money. The rich invested in monopolies while the poor just made a little bit of money in factories.