If Rome would have lost the First Punic War, she would not have gained control of the Carthaginian territories in western Sicily in Sardinia and in Corsica. If Rome had lost the Second Punic War, it is doubtful that Hannibal would have been able to maintain an occupation of a city the size of Rome. However, it is most likely that she would have lost her allies in central and southern Italy and that her territories would have been reduced to the areas around the city. The former allies at this point would have been able to keep her power in check. Of course this is speculation because we cannot possibly know a defeat of Rome did not happen.
- Places closest to the city of Rome had more rights, places farther from the city of Rome had less rights. -There were many roads all through out the roman empire, leaders were able to travel through the empire.
By retaining local government and having Persian provincial governors to maintain control and internal and external security, and to collect modest taxes to pay for it.
Augustus made the government of Rome and the Roman empire stronger. He reestablished a strong central government which was able to control the governors of the provinces of the empire who had previously acted independently form Rome.
No, Rome did not successfully conquer all of Germany during its expansion. While the Romans did make some incursions into Germanic territories, they were never able to fully conquer and control the region.
Rome was better able to send its legions and seige machines quickly into any region of its growing empire to maintain control. Conversely, they were able to send their plunder back to the capitol equally fast.
Rome was able to gain control over the entire peninsula, Greek colonies included
If Rome would have lost the First Punic War, she would not have gained control of the Carthaginian territories in western Sicily in Sardinia and in Corsica. If Rome had lost the Second Punic War, it is doubtful that Hannibal would have been able to maintain an occupation of a city the size of Rome. However, it is most likely that she would have lost her allies in central and southern Italy and that her territories would have been reduced to the areas around the city. The former allies at this point would have been able to keep her power in check. Of course this is speculation because we cannot possibly know a defeat of Rome did not happen.
They had lots of security to look out for the
Just do your landsea homework, read ! -____-
European powers were no longer able to afford the recourses to maintain control of their african countries
- Places closest to the city of Rome had more rights, places farther from the city of Rome had less rights. -There were many roads all through out the roman empire, leaders were able to travel through the empire.
By retaining local government and having Persian provincial governors to maintain control and internal and external security, and to collect modest taxes to pay for it.
Removal of gallstones does not affect weight control. If you were unable to control your weight in the past, gallstone removal is not likely to change your ability to maintain a healthy weight.
Augustus made the government of Rome and the Roman empire stronger. He reestablished a strong central government which was able to control the governors of the provinces of the empire who had previously acted independently form Rome.
No, Rome did not successfully conquer all of Germany during its expansion. While the Romans did make some incursions into Germanic territories, they were never able to fully conquer and control the region.
well you have to be able to control the ball. also be able to use both inside and outside of your foot to dribble.