0
What caused the early ancient Greek phalanx battle formation to drift to the right side of a battlefield?
Early ancient Greek phalanxes had the distinctive tendency to drift to the right side on a battlefield as they advanced. The reason for this was that the soldiers carried their large shields on the left arm because it safeguarded his comrades unshielded right side. This was not planned however, each soldier unconsciously moved toward his right side.
What else can I help you with?
What is the Battle formation used by ancient Spartans?
Phalanx Formation
What is a Phalanx in ancient Greece?
A massed fighting formation of armoured infantry.
What type of terrain was the best for the Greek battle formation of the phalanx?
Flat land allowed it to keep close formation and change its frontal direction easily, however that also favoured enemy cavalry, so the phalanx needed its own cavalry support to protect it, and also th stop enemy light infantry from attacking from all sides.
How can one effectively counter a phalanx formation in battle?
To effectively counter a phalanx formation in battle, one can use tactics such as flanking the formation, attacking from multiple directions, or using ranged weapons to weaken the formation from a distance. It is important to disrupt the cohesion of the phalanx and exploit any weaknesses in their defense to gain an advantage in the battle.
Why did ancient Rome decide to abandon the Greek phalanx battle formation?
Ancient Rome had originally fought as part of a phalanx similar to the Greek version. A evolution of change began when the Roams found out at the River Allia, this formation could be subject to an envelope tactic which enabled the attackers to penetrate the Roman flanks. In time the phalanx was therefore discarded into the legion.
What is the Battle formation used by ancient Spartans?
Phalanx Formation
What type of battle stratiegies did ancient Greece use?
the battle formation that ancient Greece used was called the phalanx formation.
What is a Phalanx in ancient Greece?
A massed fighting formation of armoured infantry.
What battle formation produced the powerful fighting force in the ancient world?
Phalanx
What is a phalanx?
A phalanx was a military formation of packed ranks of infantry locked into formation with spears providing offensive and defensive capability, and shields providing lateral and overhead protection.
What battle formation produced the most powerful fighting force in the ancient world?
Phalanx
What type of terrain was the best for the Greek battle formation of the phalanx?
Flat land allowed it to keep close formation and change its frontal direction easily, however that also favoured enemy cavalry, so the phalanx needed its own cavalry support to protect it, and also th stop enemy light infantry from attacking from all sides.
How can one effectively counter a phalanx formation in battle?
To effectively counter a phalanx formation in battle, one can use tactics such as flanking the formation, attacking from multiple directions, or using ranged weapons to weaken the formation from a distance. It is important to disrupt the cohesion of the phalanx and exploit any weaknesses in their defense to gain an advantage in the battle.
Why did ancient Rome decide to abandon the Greek phalanx battle formation?
Ancient Rome had originally fought as part of a phalanx similar to the Greek version. A evolution of change began when the Roams found out at the River Allia, this formation could be subject to an envelope tactic which enabled the attackers to penetrate the Roman flanks. In time the phalanx was therefore discarded into the legion.
What advantage did Philips soldiers have?
Their battle formation - the phalanx was a massed formation which broke less cohesive ranks. Their spears were twice as long as other Greek spears which added to the phalanx's power.
When the hoplites or infantry soldiers went into battle the marched shoulder to shoulder in a formation called a?
The hoplites fought in the phalanx formation.
What has been the controversy regarding the two types of ancient Greek phalanx formations?
The ancient Greek phalanx battle formations have been the subject of debates both in ancient history and among today's historians. In fact, it is still not clear whether the so called deep phalanx formation was a better tactic then the so called "shallow" formation. In one instance a phalanx formation composed of veterans, may have only needed ranks four rows deep. In the case of new, untested soldiers, the depth of the phalanx formation was at times 12, 16, and 32 ranks deep. Some historians believe the deeper the group, the more power it had. It had extra soldiers in the rear ranks to step forward to replenish lost troops on the front rows. This is contrasted by others who claim that extra deep ranks were redundant inasmuch as the front ranks were responsible for either the victory or the defeat in a battle.
