Britian
False.
European rulers primarily employed two basic methods of management for their colonies: direct rule and indirect rule. Direct rule involved the establishment of a centralized administration where colonial powers directly control governance, often replacing local leaders with their own officials. In contrast, indirect rule allowed local rulers to maintain their authority under the supervision of colonial powers, using existing political structures to facilitate control while minimizing administrative costs. Both methods aimed to consolidate power and extract resources from the colonies.
Signapore colonizers used indirect rule. :)
The Italian Empire primarily utilized direct rule in its colonies, characterized by the establishment of Italian administration and governance structures. This approach was evident in regions like Libya and Eritrea, where the Italian government sought to integrate the territories more closely into the Italian state. However, there were instances of indirect rule, particularly in areas where local leaders were allowed to maintain some authority under Italian oversight. Overall, direct rule was the predominant method employed by Italy in its imperial endeavors.
They weren’t “mean”. The king owned the colonies and everyone was a subject of the king. They all were English and under English rule.
Angola was under direct rule by Portugal until it gained independence in 1975.
b and c also a
Boer republics were under direct rule
the nation that had all the short black people
False.
indirect rule
No. It was under rule of Hindu Kings No. It was under rule of Hindu Kings
There are different methods for ruling a country. Specifically, a country can be ruled through direct rule, which involves the leader living in the country they rule. Or a country can be ruled through indirect rule, which involves a ruler governing from another country.
Egypt was under direct rule in ancient times. This meant that it was not a colony that had a mother country dictating its laws and appointing political figures.
European rulers primarily employed two basic methods of management for their colonies: direct rule and indirect rule. Direct rule involved the establishment of a centralized administration where colonial powers directly control governance, often replacing local leaders with their own officials. In contrast, indirect rule allowed local rulers to maintain their authority under the supervision of colonial powers, using existing political structures to facilitate control while minimizing administrative costs. Both methods aimed to consolidate power and extract resources from the colonies.
A: The system of indirect rule alienated the educated elites in preference to the illiterate ones. Q: What are some disadvantages of indirect rule?
Europeans used various methods to control their colonies, two of which were direct rule and indirect rule. Direct rule involved the replacement of local leaders with European officials, allowing for direct governance and imposition of European laws and customs. Indirect rule, on the other hand, retained local rulers in power but under European supervision, allowing for some degree of local autonomy while still ensuring that European interests were prioritized. Both methods aimed to establish and maintain control over colonized regions while minimizing resistance.