answersLogoWhite

0

The Italian Empire primarily utilized direct rule in its colonies, characterized by the establishment of Italian administration and governance structures. This approach was evident in regions like Libya and Eritrea, where the Italian government sought to integrate the territories more closely into the Italian state. However, there were instances of indirect rule, particularly in areas where local leaders were allowed to maintain some authority under Italian oversight. Overall, direct rule was the predominant method employed by Italy in its imperial endeavors.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

3w ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

Did Singapore colonizers use direct or indirect rule?

Signapore colonizers used indirect rule. :)


Why samudragupta is known as Indian napolean?

Because of his many conquests.Samudra Gupta is known as INDIAN NAPOLEON. His empire under his direct rule extended from BENGAL in the east to Delhi in the west,and the Himalayas in the north to the river Narbada in the south.But his indirect rule extended far over larger areas.


How are direct and indirect rule different why was indirect rule not always used?

You need to answer this question because we don’t do homework and your teacher is looking for your critical thinking skills and how well you understood the lesson. He/she doesn’t want us to answer. You have two questions to answer with this so make sure you do that.


How de colonist use the indirect or indirect rule to govern Africa?

Colonial powers in Africa primarily employed direct and indirect rule to govern their territories. Direct rule involved the establishment of colonial administrations with officials from the colonizing country making decisions and enforcing laws, often disregarding local customs. In contrast, indirect rule utilized existing local power structures, allowing traditional leaders to maintain authority under the oversight of colonial officials, which aimed to reduce resistance and administrative costs. This approach often manipulated local hierarchies to legitimize colonial authority while maintaining some semblance of traditional governance.


How many colonies were ruled by british?

At its height, the British Empire ruled over approximately 57 colonies, territories, and protectorates around the world. This included significant regions such as India, Canada, Australia, and parts of Africa and the Caribbean. The empire was known for its diverse governance structures, which varied from direct rule to indirect administration. Ultimately, the British Empire was one of the largest empires in history, shaping global politics and culture.

Related Questions

Did the Belgian Congo have direct rule or indirect rule?

indirect rule


How are indirect and direct rule different?

Direct rule refers direct control as regards administration whereas indirect rule means self-governing.


Is Angola a direct rule or indirect rule?

Angola was under direct rule by Portugal until it gained independence in 1975.


Is Boer indirect or direct rule?

Boer republics were under direct rule


Did Singapore colonizers use direct or indirect rule?

Signapore colonizers used indirect rule. :)


Did Britain use direct or indirect rule against china?

indirect


Did Somalia colonizers use direct or indirect rule?

direct


Did the colonist use direct or indirect rule to govern Indonesia?

direct pooop


What were the different motivations behind direct and indirect rule?

with direct rule the colonizing established a completely new governmental administration for its colony.under indirect rule the colonizing country ruled through traditional local leaders.


What is the difference between direct democracy and indirect democracy?

direct democracy is when each person rules and indirect is when people vote for people who rule.


What are the differences between direct and indirect rule?

Direct rule involves the colonial power governing the colony directly through its own officials and institutions, while indirect rule involves governing through local leaders and existing tribal structures. Direct rule is more centralized and involves greater control by the colonial power, while indirect rule allows for more local autonomy and collaboration with indigenous authorities.


Was direct rule only practiced by the English?

No. The other European nations that were colonizing Europe were practicing direct rule whereas the English practiced indirect rule.