The conquistadors had horses,guns, and wagons wich indians had lacked. Giving the conquistadors an advantage.
Better weaponry provided Spanish conquistadors with a significant advantage over the Aztec and Inca empires by allowing them to inflict greater damage with superior firepower, such as firearms and cannons, which were more effective than the traditional weapons used by indigenous forces. Additionally, the use of steel swords and armor offered better protection and lethality in combat. This technological superiority, combined with strategic military tactics and the element of surprise, enabled the conquistadors to defeat numerically larger indigenous armies. Moreover, the psychological impact of their advanced weaponry often instilled fear and confusion among their opponents.
No, combat was limited to the Philippines and the Caribbean.
First, the berserkers were the Vikings unique fighters. They, the berserkers, were used to frighten the enemy which gave the Vikings such a psychological advantage that their fame continues today. So, how were the berserkers used in combat? They were used to fighten the enemy for the Vikings.
The ancient Filipinos were overpowered by a few Spanish soldiers primarily due to their advanced military technology, including firearms and cannons, which gave them a significant advantage in combat. Additionally, the Spanish were able to exploit existing rivalries and divisions among local tribes, forming alliances that weakened unified resistance. The use of strategic tactics and the element of surprise also contributed to their success in subduing larger but less organized groups. Lastly, the impact of diseases brought by the Europeans weakened indigenous populations, further facilitating Spanish conquest.
No, both belligerents were actively engaged in combat. A proxy war involves others doing the fighting and keeping your own troops out of the fray.
Better weaponry provided Spanish conquistadors with a significant advantage over the Aztec and Inca empires by allowing them to inflict greater damage with superior firepower, such as firearms and cannons, which were more effective than the traditional weapons used by indigenous forces. Additionally, the use of steel swords and armor offered better protection and lethality in combat. This technological superiority, combined with strategic military tactics and the element of surprise, enabled the conquistadors to defeat numerically larger indigenous armies. Moreover, the psychological impact of their advanced weaponry often instilled fear and confusion among their opponents.
The Aztecs primarily focused on agriculture and trade, utilizing weapons such as obsidian blades and wooden clubs, which were effective for their needs but less advanced than the metal weaponry of the conquistadors. The Spanish brought firearms, steel swords, and armor, products of European metallurgy and military innovation. Additionally, the Aztec warfare strategy emphasized large-scale battles and psychological tactics rather than the individual combat techniques that the conquistadors employed. Consequently, the technological disparity in weaponry contributed significantly to the Spanish conquest.
Vasco Núñez de Balboa primarily used traditional 16th-century weapons such as swords, crossbows, and firearms like arquebuses. His arsenal reflected the typical armaments of Spanish conquistadors, which were designed for both melee and ranged combat. Balboa's expeditions in the New World also involved the use of steel weapons, which gave him a significant advantage over the indigenous populations he encountered.
the Aztecs as other native American races were defeated for several reasons: the spanish soldiers had allied with other tribes to defeat them (the tlaxcalls) the spanish soldiers carried diseases that killed many Indians (smallpox) the spanish had technologies that gave them advantage in combat (horses powder and different combat strategies)
Hernán Cortés primarily used Spanish horses, particularly the Andalusian breed, during his conquest of the Aztec Empire. These horses were known for their strength, agility, and endurance, making them well-suited for both combat and exploration. The introduction of horses had a significant impact on the dynamics of the conquest, as they provided a tactical advantage over the indigenous peoples, who had not encountered cavalry before.
Please help me with this answer
Yes. Argonia's have an advantage in that.
Combat Arms is competely free you don't have to pay at all(unless you are using Nexon Cash). which gives u a big advantage...
It is estimated that over 20,600 died from combat, shipwreck and drowning, and disease.
It included both a Naval War and land combat.
No, combat was limited to the Philippines and the Caribbean.
there shape, weight, and aerodynamics are not qualified thus would be having an advantage for speed and close combat,