answersLogoWhite

0

The Compromise of 1850 undid much of the work of the Missouri Compromise made a few years prior. Unfortunately, the Compromise of 1850 did not alleviate the tensions of the slave debate, and the Civil War broke out just ten years later.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Which decision voided the Missouri Compromise and let territories decide on the issue of slavery themselves instead of letting Congress do so?

compromise of 1850


Why did the northerners protest Douglas's plan to repeal The Missouri Compromise?

The northerners protests DouglasÕs plan to repeal the Missouri Compromise because it would have made slavery legal in the northern territories. The Missouri Compromise had outlawed slavery in territories and new states above the Missouri Compromise line.


What law was declared null and void because of the Dred Scott decision?

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was declared null and void by the Dred Scott decision. This ruling by the Supreme Court held that Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories, effectively invalidating the Missouri Compromise's restriction on slavery in the northern territories.


Who engineered The Missouri Compromise?

In 1820 to 1821, Henry Clay engineered the Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 by the United States Congress.


Who wrote the Missouri comprsie?

The Missouri Compromise was created between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions within the United States Congress. This document set clear regulations on the issue of slavery in the western territories. Henry Clay was the actual writer of the Missouri Compromise.


What were some of the problems during The Missouri Compromise?

Increasing influence of the Abolitionists in Congress, and hostility towards the new territories that were entitled to practise slavery because they were on the right side of the Missouri parallel.


What was unconstitutional about The Missouri Compromise What relationship did this unconstitutional compromise have to dred Scott's citizenship?

The Missouri Compromise was deemed unconstitutional because it violated the Fifth Amendment, which protects individuals from being deprived of property without due process. The compromise allowed Congress to regulate slavery in certain territories, effectively treating enslaved people as property. This relationship is highlighted in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, where the Supreme Court ruled that Scott, an enslaved man, could not be a citizen and that Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in the territories, thereby nullifying the Missouri Compromise.


The forced Congress to decide if slavery would be allowed in regions west of the Mississippi.?

Missouri compromise


2 What was the purpose of the Missouri Compromise?

to end an agruement about the territories


After the Missouri compromise how many slave territories were there?

After the Missouri Compromise of 1820, there were essentially two designated slave territories: Missouri, which was admitted as a slave state, and Arkansas Territory (which later became Arkansas). The compromise aimed to maintain the balance between free and slave states, allowing slavery in Missouri while prohibiting it north of the 36°30' parallel, except for Missouri itself. Thus, the compromise established a clear boundary for the expansion of slavery in the western territories.


Which compromise in 1820 allowed the balance of power in congress to remain equal?

Missouri Compromise


How did westward expansion undermine the Missouri Compromise?

The Missouri Compromise only affected those territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. After the Mexican War, the vast new territories like California did not fall under the provisions of the Compromise.