In a state of nature, a term first coined by Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes, in his writings, compared the state of nature to a "condition of war," describing it this way:
Whatsoever therefore is consequent to a time of war, where every man is enemy to every man, the same consequent to the time wherein men live without other security than what their own strength and their own invention shall furnish them withal. In such condition there is no place for industry, because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving and removing such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.john Locke used this idea to propose his "social contract" theory, in which people agree to be governed in return for government protecting their natural rights.John Locke believed that society needed a government based on the principles of democracy and the social contract. He argued for a government that protects individuals' natural rights to life, liberty, and property, and that derives its authority from the consent of the governed. Locke emphasized the importance of limited government, separation of powers, and the right of the people to overthrow a government that fails to uphold their rights.
John Locke believed that people should set up a new government when the existing government fails to protect their natural rights, namely life, liberty, and property. He argued that when a government violates these rights, people have the right to rebel and form a new government that will secure and protect their rights.
John Locke believed that rebellion against government was not appropriate when a government was functioning effectively and protecting the natural rights of its citizens—namely, life, liberty, and property. He argued that people should only rebel when a government becomes tyrannical and fails to uphold these rights, thereby losing its legitimacy. In such circumstances, citizens have the right to overthrow a government that violates the social contract.
When Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence he used the thinking of Locke. For a thousand years kings and queens had ruled the world. They did what they wanted, when they wanted, and treated people as they wanted. Locke stated the people had the RIGHT to chose leaders and government. That they also had God given rights. This was a new way to think of government. If you picture a triangle in the old way of kings they would be at the very top with everyone below them, but Locke turned the triangle on it's side making everyone the same. The king was no longer on top. These ideas influenced the men who made up Congress as they decided to break from England. The population, in general, didn't necessarily think about revolution or government, but were more concerned with living. The white land owning men who were over 21 didn't vote most of the time when there was an election so they weren't thinking about john Locke or even Jefferson. The 55 men who were the framers of the government were the MOST important and educated of the colonies were reading the philosophy of Locke and others.
I think you have it backwards, but that the United States democracy is based on the philosophy of Locke so the constitution agreed with Locke.
A Democratic System
limited power government that is checked and balanced, and one where everyone is treated equally
The British revolution
John Locke believed in a constitutional government that protected natural rights, such as life, liberty, and property. He advocated for a government with limited powers and a system of checks and balances to prevent tyranny. Locke believed that individuals had the right to rebel against a government that violated their natural rights.
John Locke believed that society needed a government based on the principles of democracy and the social contract. He argued for a government that protects individuals' natural rights to life, liberty, and property, and that derives its authority from the consent of the governed. Locke emphasized the importance of limited government, separation of powers, and the right of the people to overthrow a government that fails to uphold their rights.
I think it is the Declaration of Independence or John Locke's book "common sense"
One of the Enlightenment thinkers who believed that people had the right to overthrow bad governments was John Locke. Locke argued that if a government fails to protect the natural rights of its citizens – life, liberty, and property – then the people have the right to rebel and establish a new government.
no because john had agreed with everything with the government expect that the government shouldnt be able to abuse their power and the governemnt does try to abuse all the time.
John Locke believed that people should set up a new government when the existing government fails to protect their natural rights, namely life, liberty, and property. He argued that when a government violates these rights, people have the right to rebel and form a new government that will secure and protect their rights.
He did, and if you are asking this question for the reason that I think you are, he also had a heavy influence on the Declaration of Independence.
He states that people have a right to change the government. The thing about Locke is that he wrote this in a time when only kings had ruled for a thousand years. It was a revolutionary thought for it’s time.
What does Jefferson think will happen if the Constitution is not followed strictly?