In the USA until the late fifties, usually as Communists.
haymarket riot
d. Strikes. I have the same text.
Just stop cheating
It was a derogatory term for Strikebreakers who came in and took the jobs that workers were striking against.
Scabs. That is a worker who doesn't go out on strike with the rest of the work force and it is still used today by striking workers.
Communists
true
Striking industrial workers-novanet
Yes, employers have the legal right to fire workers who are on strike, as long as the strike is not protected by labor laws or collective bargaining agreements.
The employers did not like strikes. They would say that employees on strike were being unfair and did not understand the economic conditions of what they were doing.
To prevent an industrial action from affecting production apexTo get employers to submit to collective bargaining. apex
peak
As a rule striking workers do not get paid by there employers. If the industrial action being taken is santioned by the Trade union then the union has funds that ensure that the workers are paid for there actions. This may not be as much as the worker would have got but it might be in the long term.
Communists
Workers' Compensation was an insurance fund financed by employers.
Labor unions view striking as a crucial tool for several reasons. It serves as a powerful means of collective action to demonstrate solidarity among workers and leverage their bargaining power against employers. Strikes can draw public attention to labor disputes, pressuring employers to negotiate better wages, benefits, and working conditions. Additionally, the potential economic impact of a strike often compels employers to engage in meaningful discussions to resolve issues.
striking industrial workers