The Harrying of the North was not a person. It was one of the ways that William I controlled England. William's army went up the the top half of England. It was very unpopular. For more information see: What was the Harrying of the North?
nothing
Hereward the wake and the fens were rebelling on William
Harrying of the north I believe
the harrying of the north ended in 1071. This was when the people in the north of England stopped rebelling because William had killed 100,000, 10,000 of which starved to death because of the fact that William, Duke of Normandy burned down all their crops.
The harrying of the north took place in the north of England in the winter of 1069 and 1070.
The Harrying of the North was not a person. It was one of the ways that William I controlled England. William's army went up the the top half of England. It was very unpopular. For more information see: What was the Harrying of the North?
The English rebelled against him because they were angry with him. The people from the north especially, because of the harrying of the north.
The harrying of the north was seen as a solution by William the Conqueror to crush resistance and establish control over the region after the Norman Conquest of England. By devastating the countryside and destroying resources, William sought to break the spirit of the rebels and deter future uprisings. It was effective in suppressing dissent and solidifying Norman rule in Northern England.
nothing
stuff
Hereward the wake and the fens were rebelling on William
in the harrying of the north williams ary had gone to the noth and burnt houses throw salt on the floor
Harrying of the north I believe
Lot's and lot's
I don't know wat it means
the harrying of the north ended in 1071. This was when the people in the north of England stopped rebelling because William had killed 100,000, 10,000 of which starved to death because of the fact that William, Duke of Normandy burned down all their crops.