There are no dissenting judges as to the power of the American military. From the president being the commander-in-Chief to the Congress controlling the budget and funding, the military is subject to civilian control.
The Courts
it will ensure that the military has enough man power to do the job
Militarism
Opinions differ on whether or not judicial review gives nine justices too much power. It gives the court the ability to either dismiss or reverse laws that it considers to violate the Constitution. There are those who believe the court should have this power, even if they don't always agree with its decisions. There are others who believe judicial review itself is unconstitutional.
the conventional military is less important than nuclear weapons
There are no dissenting judges as to the power of the American military. From the president being the commander-in-Chief to the Congress controlling the budget and funding, the military is subject to civilian control.
The Courts
A military controlling government and power is dangerous. It becomes a hunta and can install a military dictator to run the government. When that happens there is a loss of rights by the citizens. Checks on authorities is lost when the authorities can shoot citizens because they protest the government.
sign bill into law serve as commander in chief of the u.s. military nominate supreme court justices
the power to remove federal justices .... ;)
The president doesn't have judicial power. Only the judicial branch has this power.
executive branch
the president
Some people feared that print could lead to the growth of dissenting ideas because it allowed information and knowledge to be more accessible to a wider audience, potentially challenging established authorities and beliefs. The spread of alternative viewpoints through print could undermine existing power structures and social norms, leading to social and political unrest.
the Senate
the power to remove federal justices .... ;)
the power to remove federal justices