0
What else can I help you with?
What did the north and south gain and lose from the Missouri compromise?
Missouri was allowed to join the USA as a slave-state. Other territories within the Louisiana Purchase, south of Latitude 36.30, could also join as slave-states.
What are three reasons why The Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the compromise of 1850 could be the leading cause to the American civil war?
The Missouri Compromise was not a cause of the war - it was a reasonable deal that delayed hostilities for forty years. The Compromise of 1850 included a provision to toughen-up the Fugitive Slave Act, and this became an emotive issue in the North, especially when Uncle Tom's Cabin was published soon after.
What was the Critten compromise?
The Crittenden Compromise was a proposal put forth by Senator John J. Crittenden in late 1860 in an effort to prevent the impending Civil War. It aimed to resolve the sectional conflict by re-establishing the Missouri Compromise line, extending it westward, and allowing slavery in territories south of the line while prohibiting it north of the line. The proposal also included constitutional amendments to protect slavery in states where it already existed. Ultimately, the Crittenden Compromise failed to gain sufficient support and was rejected by Congress.
What did the North think about slaves?
The North had less use for slaves than the South did, and many Northern people helped slaves gain freedom.
When North Korea invaded South Korea it gained control over which country?
None. It never managed to gain control of South Korea.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of The Missouri Compromise?
An advantage to the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was that slavery would not be permitted in the territory that is now the state of Missouri. A disadvantage to the Missouri Compromise was that people who believed in slavery in the South could not move north to gain more land and keep their slaves.
What did the south stand to gain as a reault of The Missouri Compromise?
The assurance that there would be no new slave-states North of the Missouri line.
What did the north and south gain and lose from the Missouri compromise?
Missouri was allowed to join the USA as a slave-state. Other territories within the Louisiana Purchase, south of Latitude 36.30, could also join as slave-states.
What law did Missouri follow in order to gain statehood?
The Missouri Compromise, which said that slavery was to be banned anywhere north of the 36th parallel, with the exception of Missouri.
How did Maine gain statehood?
It entered the Union as a result of the Missouri Compromise.
What did the south stand lose and gain during The Missouri Compromise?
They gained Missouri as a slave holding state as well as the land below the 36°30' parallel known as the Arkansas Territory. They lost the chance to admit more slave holding states besides what they owned in the small territory due to the Missouri Compromise Line.
What did the south gain from the Compromise of 1877?
problems were solved
What are three reasons why The Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the compromise of 1850 could be the leading cause to the American civil war?
The Missouri Compromise was not a cause of the war - it was a reasonable deal that delayed hostilities for forty years. The Compromise of 1850 included a provision to toughen-up the Fugitive Slave Act, and this became an emotive issue in the North, especially when Uncle Tom's Cabin was published soon after.
What was the Critten compromise?
The Crittenden Compromise was a proposal put forth by Senator John J. Crittenden in late 1860 in an effort to prevent the impending Civil War. It aimed to resolve the sectional conflict by re-establishing the Missouri Compromise line, extending it westward, and allowing slavery in territories south of the line while prohibiting it north of the line. The proposal also included constitutional amendments to protect slavery in states where it already existed. Ultimately, the Crittenden Compromise failed to gain sufficient support and was rejected by Congress.
What effect did the Dred Scott Supreme Court case have on Dred Scott's freddom and on the Missouri Compromise?
Scott didn't win his freedom and the decision reinforced the idea that slaves were property. The Missouri Compromise was a blow to the southern states to gain more slave states. I don't think the Scott decision added anything to the compromise, but it did entrench slavery in the states where it existed.
What did the north gain during the Compromise of 1850?
The admission of California as free soil, and the abolition of the slave-trade in DC.
What the north gain from the compromise of 1850?
They gained all states above the imaginary line, i dont remember where it was set
