The famines in India, particularly the Great Bengal Famine of 1943, highlighted the British government's neglect and exploitative policies, leading to widespread suffering and death. Many Indians perceived the British colonial administration as prioritizing war efforts and resource extraction over the welfare of the local population. This betrayal fostered resentment, eroded trust, and galvanized anti-colonial sentiments, ultimately alienating the goodwill of Indians toward British rule. The famines served as a stark reminder of the dire consequences of colonial indifference and exploitation.
did the British began stationing regular British troops at the center of colonial resistance: Philadelphia
A party founded in 1885 with the objective of helping educated Indians gain a greater share in the then British Government
it was the British and Indians i am thinking. i could be wrong though
The British colonial Empire had the largest colonial extent of all countries. It owned colonies on every continent, of course leaving out Antarctica.
all of the answers are correct.
all of the answers are correct.
The British appointed Indians to the council which gave Indians a sense of pride and a voice in politics
The British appointed Indians to the council which gave Indians a sense of pride and a voice in politics
Inidans didn't care
It familiarized native Indians with British cultural references
The famines in India, particularly the Great Bengal Famine of 1943, highlighted the British government's neglect and exploitative policies, leading to widespread suffering and death. Many Indians perceived the British colonial administration as prioritizing war efforts and resource extraction over the welfare of the local population. This betrayal fostered resentment, eroded trust, and galvanized anti-colonial sentiments, ultimately alienating the goodwill of Indians toward British rule. The famines served as a stark reminder of the dire consequences of colonial indifference and exploitation.
In "The India and Colonial Exhibition," Mukharji highlights that the British viewed visiting Indians with a mix of curiosity and condescension. They often regarded Indians as exotic subjects of the empire, showcasing their culture as a spectacle while simultaneously reinforcing stereotypes of inferiority. This dynamic reflected the broader attitudes of colonial superiority, where the British felt a sense of entitlement over Indian culture and identity. Overall, the exhibition served both as a platform for showcasing Indian heritage and as a tool for asserting British dominance.
Indians had to be removed because they wouldn't have allowed the french or Britain settle there and take their land which the British needed to settle and to start a new colonial
The British colonial rule over India was marked by the looting of natural resources, the mistreatment of the local people and the the collapse of the Indigenous Indian Industries.
The British treated Indians and Africans differently in terms of slavery. In India, slavery was not as widespread or institutionalized as it was in Africa. The British primarily relied on the African slave trade to support their colonial labor needs, particularly in the Caribbean and the Americas.
Lord Dunmore, born John Murray, was educated at Eton College in England. This prestigious institution provided him with a classical education, which was typical for members of the British aristocracy at the time. His education contributed to his later roles in colonial governance and military service.