answersLogoWhite

0

The famines in India, particularly the Great Bengal Famine of 1943, highlighted the British government's neglect and exploitative policies, leading to widespread suffering and death. Many Indians perceived the British colonial administration as prioritizing war efforts and resource extraction over the welfare of the local population. This betrayal fostered resentment, eroded trust, and galvanized anti-colonial sentiments, ultimately alienating the goodwill of Indians toward British rule. The famines served as a stark reminder of the dire consequences of colonial indifference and exploitation.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

3w ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What be a negative outcome of the British governing of India?

The British did not allow Indians into key government positions. British policies let to nore famines. (apex)


What would be a negative outcome of the British governing of India?

The British did not allow Indians into key government positions. British policies let to nore famines. (apex)


What would be a negative outcome of the British governing of India.?

The British did not allow Indians into key government positions. British policies let to nore famines. (apex)


Why did 30 million Indians die of starvation between the 1800 and 1900?

Between 1800 and 1900, approximately 30 million Indians died of starvation largely due to a combination of British colonial policies, economic exploitation, and natural disasters. The British administration prioritized cash crop production for export over food crops, leading to food scarcity. Additionally, inadequate response to famines and poor infrastructure hindered relief efforts, exacerbating the crisis. These factors, alongside widespread poverty and social upheaval, contributed to the devastating famines during this period.


What was the condition of India during the time of britishers?

It was really poor. Indians and the Indian rulers were treated as puppets. British used to be given high jobs and Indians were given jobs below their qualifications. The British looted most of the India. Peasents were treated as slaves. Tax was too high and their were man made famines. The british forced the farmers to grow cotton and indigo which were used as raw materials in industries. They abolished many Indian rituals as sati system, polygamy and child marriage. They opened schools also where all type of children of all religions were given education. There was more discrimination between the British and Indians. Indians were dying for the independence.


How many famines are mentioned in the Bible?

There are thirteen famines mentioned in the Bible.


What was it like in India under british rule?

the british treated Indians like inferior humans. british building had boards saying "dogs and Indians not allowed". during the british rule an estmated 40 million Indians died due to massacres and famines. as a mater of fact: regions longest under british rule were the poorest regions in India.


What is the plural of famine?

Famines.


What is famines?

an extreme shortage of food


Which diseases are caused by famines?

Famines in themselves do not cause disease; they cause malnutrition, which is a preventable condition that can be considered as a disease. There are other diseases that are common in areas where there are famines and most of these have to do with sanitation. The leading killer in the world is cholera which is from drinking unsafe water.


What has the author Leslie Williams written?

Leslie Williams has written: 'Daniel O'Connell, the British press, and the Irish famine' -- subject(s): British Foreign public opinion, Famines, History, Press coverage, Public opinion, Relations 'What's behind that tree?'


What has the author Fedir Klymenko written?

Fedir Klymenko has written: 'Holodomor' -- subject(s): Catalogs, In art, History, Famines, Famines in art