0
The famines in India, particularly the Great Bengal Famine of 1943, highlighted the British government's neglect and exploitative policies, leading to widespread suffering and death. Many Indians perceived the British colonial administration as prioritizing war efforts and resource extraction over the welfare of the local population. This betrayal fostered resentment, eroded trust, and galvanized anti-colonial sentiments, ultimately alienating the goodwill of Indians toward British rule. The famines served as a stark reminder of the dire consequences of colonial indifference and exploitation.
What else can I help you with?
Bad effects of British rule in India?
The British benefited much more from the economic system than most Indians did.British pressure on farmers to switch from food crops to cash crops contributed to famines that killed millions of Indians.Much of India endured deforestationThe systematic clearing of forests. to make room for cash crops.The importing of British textiles damaged the Indian textile industry.The British refused to give Indians key roles in government.The school system set up by the British served only the elite; roughly 90 percent of Indians did not benefit from the schools.
How many protestants died in the Irish famines?
none
What percentage of famines are directly related to war or conflict?
12
The failure of soviet agricultural policy was demostrated by?
2 mass famines
Where were there famines in Russia after World War 2?
yes u idot
What be a negative outcome of the British governing of India?
The British did not allow Indians into key government positions. British policies let to nore famines. (apex)
What would be a negative outcome of the British governing of India?
The British did not allow Indians into key government positions. British policies let to nore famines. (apex)
What would be a negative outcome of the British governing of India.?
The British did not allow Indians into key government positions. British policies let to nore famines. (apex)
Why did 30 million Indians die of starvation between the 1800 and 1900?
Between 1800 and 1900, approximately 30 million Indians died of starvation largely due to a combination of British colonial policies, economic exploitation, and natural disasters. The British administration prioritized cash crop production for export over food crops, leading to food scarcity. Additionally, inadequate response to famines and poor infrastructure hindered relief efforts, exacerbating the crisis. These factors, alongside widespread poverty and social upheaval, contributed to the devastating famines during this period.
What was the condition of India during the time of britishers?
It was really poor. Indians and the Indian rulers were treated as puppets. British used to be given high jobs and Indians were given jobs below their qualifications. The British looted most of the India. Peasents were treated as slaves. Tax was too high and their were man made famines. The british forced the farmers to grow cotton and indigo which were used as raw materials in industries. They abolished many Indian rituals as sati system, polygamy and child marriage. They opened schools also where all type of children of all religions were given education. There was more discrimination between the British and Indians. Indians were dying for the independence.
What were the position and negative effects of British rule on Indians?
British rule in India, established in the 18th century and formalized in the 19th century, positioned Britain as a colonial power that exploited India's resources and labor for its economic benefit. While it introduced some infrastructure, such as railways and telegraphs, the negative effects included widespread poverty, cultural suppression, and the destruction of local industries. The economic policies favored British interests, leading to famines and significant social upheaval. Ultimately, British rule fostered resentment and fueled the struggle for independence among Indians.
What did the british encourage the indans to grow instead of food?
The British encouraged Indians to grow cash crops such as cotton, indigo, tea, and opium instead of food crops. This shift was driven by the British need for raw materials for their industries and markets. As a result, food production declined, leading to food shortages and famines in India. This exploitative agricultural policy contributed to significant economic and social upheaval in the region.
How many famines are mentioned in the Bible?
There are thirteen famines mentioned in the Bible.
What was it like in India under british rule?
the british treated Indians like inferior humans. british building had boards saying "dogs and Indians not allowed". during the british rule an estmated 40 million Indians died due to massacres and famines. as a mater of fact: regions longest under british rule were the poorest regions in India.
What is the plural of famine?
Famines.
What happened when the British encouraged Indians to grow cash crops?
When the British encouraged Indians to grow cash crops, it shifted agricultural focus from subsistence farming to the production of cash crops like cotton, indigo, and opium. This led to significant economic changes, including increased export revenues for Britain but also resulted in food shortages and famines in India, as farmers prioritized cash crops over food production. The reliance on cash crops made Indian agriculture vulnerable to market fluctuations and contributed to widespread poverty among farmers. Ultimately, this exploitation intensified resistance to British rule and fueled the Indian independence movement.
What is famines?
an extreme shortage of food
