they make wheat
They were no longer enslaved but many became sharecroppers.
No, all sharecroppers were not African American
Landowners often took advantage of sharecroppers by imposing unfair contracts that heavily favored the landowners, resulting in sharecroppers receiving a minimal portion of the crop yield. They would also charge high prices for supplies and rent, making it difficult for sharecroppers to escape a cycle of debt. This exploitation perpetuated economic dependency and limited the ability of sharecroppers to improve their living conditions.
Landowners often exploited sharecroppers through unfair contracts that favored the landowners, leaving sharecroppers in debt and with little profit. They manipulated the pricing of essential goods and services, which sharecroppers had to purchase from the landowners, effectively trapping them in a cycle of poverty. Additionally, the lack of legal protections and the illiteracy of many sharecroppers made it difficult for them to understand or contest the terms of their agreements. This power imbalance created an environment where cheating was both easy and common.
Sharecroppers typically did not own the land they worked on; instead, they rented it from landowners, often in exchange for a portion of the crops produced. This system was prevalent in the Southern United States after the Civil War, where landowners provided land, tools, and sometimes seed, while sharecroppers contributed labor. The arrangement often led to cycles of debt and poverty for the sharecroppers, as they struggled to meet their obligations to the landowners.
Sharecroppers could have planted:CottonRiceCorn
The Sharecroppers farmers in the south will like not prosper after the war.
They were no longer enslaved but many became sharecroppers.
No, all sharecroppers were not African American
An advantage of sharecropping over slavery was that sharecroppers had more independence and autonomy in their work. While still facing challenges, sharecroppers had the opportunity to negotiate terms and potentially earn a share of the profits from their labor.
So many freedmen and poor whites became sharecroppers.
FARMER
why did farmers become sharecroppers sharecropping offered a measure of independance
Sharecropping contracts typically favored the landowners, often resulting in unfair terms for the sharecroppers. Landowners controlled the land, tools, and supplies, ultimately keeping a significant portion of the crops produced by sharecroppers. Sharecroppers were often left with very little profit or autonomy.
Landowners often exploited sharecroppers by charging high interest rates on loans for supplies and equipment, resulting in perpetual debt for the sharecroppers. Additionally, landowners would often manipulate the accounting of crop yields and prices, leading to sharecroppers receiving lower profits than they deserved.
Landowners often took advantage of sharecroppers by imposing unfair contracts that heavily favored the landowners, resulting in sharecroppers receiving a minimal portion of the crop yield. They would also charge high prices for supplies and rent, making it difficult for sharecroppers to escape a cycle of debt. This exploitation perpetuated economic dependency and limited the ability of sharecroppers to improve their living conditions.
Keeping sharecroppers indebted ensures a cheap and reliable labor force, as indebted sharecroppers are less likely to leave or demand better working conditions. It also gives landowners control over the sharecroppers' output, allowing them to maintain economic and social power over them.