answersLogoWhite

0

To put it very simply, the economic reasons that contributed to Rome's fall was that more money went out with no money coming in to replace it. Rome depended upon the spoils of conquest for most of her income. When they stopped foreign conquest and set their borders, these spoils dried up. However the Romans were still great consumers. They continued to demand luxury items such as spices and herbs from southeast Asia and silk from China. 100 million sesterces a year were said to have left Rome by way of the Silk Road, with Rome having no mean to replace that economic drain.

To put it very simply, the economic reasons that contributed to Rome's fall was that more money went out with no money coming in to replace it. Rome depended upon the spoils of conquest for most of her income. When they stopped foreign conquest and set their borders, these spoils dried up. However the Romans were still great consumers. They continued to demand luxury items such as spices and herbs from southeast Asia and silk from China. 100 million sesterces a year were said to have left Rome by way of the Silk Road, with Rome having no mean to replace that economic drain.

To put it very simply, the economic reasons that contributed to Rome's fall was that more money went out with no money coming in to replace it. Rome depended upon the spoils of conquest for most of her income. When they stopped foreign conquest and set their borders, these spoils dried up. However the Romans were still great consumers. They continued to demand luxury items such as spices and herbs from southeast Asia and silk from China. 100 million sesterces a year were said to have left Rome by way of the Silk Road, with Rome having no mean to replace that economic drain.

To put it very simply, the economic reasons that contributed to Rome's fall was that more money went out with no money coming in to replace it. Rome depended upon the spoils of conquest for most of her income. When they stopped foreign conquest and set their borders, these spoils dried up. However the Romans were still great consumers. They continued to demand luxury items such as spices and herbs from southeast Asia and silk from China. 100 million sesterces a year were said to have left Rome by way of the Silk Road, with Rome having no mean to replace that economic drain.

To put it very simply, the economic reasons that contributed to Rome's fall was that more money went out with no money coming in to replace it. Rome depended upon the spoils of conquest for most of her income. When they stopped foreign conquest and set their borders, these spoils dried up. However the Romans were still great consumers. They continued to demand luxury items such as spices and herbs from southeast Asia and silk from China. 100 million sesterces a year were said to have left Rome by way of the Silk Road, with Rome having no mean to replace that economic drain.

To put it very simply, the economic reasons that contributed to Rome's fall was that more money went out with no money coming in to replace it. Rome depended upon the spoils of conquest for most of her income. When they stopped foreign conquest and set their borders, these spoils dried up. However the Romans were still great consumers. They continued to demand luxury items such as spices and herbs from southeast Asia and silk from China. 100 million sesterces a year were said to have left Rome by way of the Silk Road, with Rome having no mean to replace that economic drain.

To put it very simply, the economic reasons that contributed to Rome's fall was that more money went out with no money coming in to replace it. Rome depended upon the spoils of conquest for most of her income. When they stopped foreign conquest and set their borders, these spoils dried up. However the Romans were still great consumers. They continued to demand luxury items such as spices and herbs from southeast Asia and silk from China. 100 million sesterces a year were said to have left Rome by way of the Silk Road, with Rome having no mean to replace that economic drain.

To put it very simply, the economic reasons that contributed to Rome's fall was that more money went out with no money coming in to replace it. Rome depended upon the spoils of conquest for most of her income. When they stopped foreign conquest and set their borders, these spoils dried up. However the Romans were still great consumers. They continued to demand luxury items such as spices and herbs from southeast Asia and silk from China. 100 million sesterces a year were said to have left Rome by way of the Silk Road, with Rome having no mean to replace that economic drain.

To put it very simply, the economic reasons that contributed to Rome's fall was that more money went out with no money coming in to replace it. Rome depended upon the spoils of conquest for most of her income. When they stopped foreign conquest and set their borders, these spoils dried up. However the Romans were still great consumers. They continued to demand luxury items such as spices and herbs from southeast Asia and silk from China. 100 million sesterces a year were said to have left Rome by way of the Silk Road, with Rome having no mean to replace that economic drain.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Economic reasons of the fall of the Han Dynasty?

black people


Was Jamestown established for religious or economic reasons?

Jamestown was primarily established for economic reasons, not religious reasons.


What is the birth name of Charles Romes?

Charles Romes's birth name is Charles Michael Romes.


Was North Carolina established for religion or economic reasons?

North Carolina was established for economic reasons.


What were the reasons on why slavery started worldwide?

Economic reasons.


What are the many reasons historains give for the fall of the roman empire?

It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.


Where do most countries fall on the economic continuum?

Countries will fall on a market economic continuum. So it is a market


How tall is Charles Romes?

Charles Romes is 6' 1".


Why do you immigrate?

People immigrate for political reasons and for economic reasons.


What are some reasons that is not for the decline and the fall of the roman empire?

Find out what the reasons were and decided what were not the reasons.


Why do they have slavery?

Normally for economic reasons


What is the economic theory given for the fall of the Indus valley?

A decline in trade is the economic theory given for the fall of the Indus Valley civilization.