no one fought in it. it was just soldiers with guns and colonist were throwing rocks and sticks at them.In the Boston massacre the English soldiers and the colonist "fought" in the battle.
The Boston Massacre involved nine British Army soldiers who were being harassed and verbally abused by an angry civilian mob. Without being ordered to do so, the soldiers fired into the crowd of people, killing five and injuring six.
It was during the Revolution
British soldiers would make the colonists give them food and shelter.
No, the colonists did not throw clam shells at the British during the Boston Massacre. The event, which took place on March 5, 1770, involved a confrontation between British soldiers and a crowd of colonists who were protesting British rule. The protesters were throwing snowballs and other objects, but clam shells were not specifically mentioned as part of the incident. The clash escalated and resulted in British soldiers firing into the crowd, killing several colonists.
It was the Colonist V.S. the British Soldiers. It was the Colonist V.S. the British Soldiers.
no one fought in it. it was just soldiers with guns and colonist were throwing rocks and sticks at them.In the Boston massacre the English soldiers and the colonist "fought" in the battle.
The Boston Massacre involved nine British Army soldiers who were being harassed and verbally abused by an angry civilian mob. Without being ordered to do so, the soldiers fired into the crowd of people, killing five and injuring six.
France and Britian, there are many reasons why but one i know of is because the king wanted to tax the colonist to pay off soldiers war debt.
Blockade them!
It was during the Revolution
They answered to all of their commands
1770
food supplies and soldiers
British soldiers would make the colonists give them food and shelter.
Colonists had thrown rocks and snowballs at the soldiers.
1777