Much of these charts were written in the Dresden Codex, a document smuggled out of Central America at a time when the Spanish were destroying Mayan documents, regarding them as pagan.
they use the evidence from the past that will tell them what exactly happened, or they ask people who were at that certain place and time.
poo poo wee wee testicle balls boobs
Historians use evidence such as documents, artifacts, and oral histories to reconstruct and interpret past events and societies. They critically analyze these sources for authenticity, context, and perspective, often comparing multiple accounts to gain a more comprehensive understanding. By synthesizing this evidence, historians can build narratives that explain the complexities of human experiences over time. This rigorous methodology allows them to draw conclusions about social, political, and cultural developments in history.
No they don't because some historians believe that the universe was created by the big bang and others by god. Or the dinosaurs some historians think they were killed by a meteor. They don't agree about everything because there isn't enough evidence to prove something. And it is OK.
Historians rely on primary sources to reach conclusions. Gaps in history, where there is no written documentation of events may leave historians in a quandary. They must then rely on archaeological evidence, and secondary sources, if available. Historians must ask the following: Is the information reliable? What was the reputation of the writer at the time? Does the archaeological record, primary, or secondary sources disagree with previously published historiography concerning the person or event? How accurate is prior published historiography concerning the subject matter? New evidence can displace old theories regarding history, so historians must be ready to adjust their thesis to reflect this information. Historians must also recognize that myth may shroud the truth about history. "Lost Cause" mythology concerning the American Civil War is a good example of lies perpetuated as history that has been disproved by primary sources.
The evidence might be unreliable because technology and other knowledge has advanced since that time, and their evidence might have been biased.
Historians analyze evidence by examining its reliability, relevance, and context. They assess the source of the evidence, its bias, and corroborating or contradictory evidence to form a well-supported interpretation of the past. Additionally, historians use critical thinking skills to evaluate the perspectives and motives of the sources providing the evidence.
Historians have concluded that the Harappan civilization was highly advanced, with well-planned cities, advanced architectural techniques, and a sophisticated system of governance. The presence of standardized weights and measures, urban sanitation systems, and evidence of trade networks indicate a complex society that flourished in the Indus Valley. However, the reason for the decline of the Harappan civilization remains a subject of debate among historians.
Historians look for evidence to support their understanding and interpretation of the past. Evidence helps validate their arguments, provide context, and support conclusions about historical events and figures. By examining various forms of evidence, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of history.
Historians need access to primary sources such as documents, artifacts, and oral histories to conduct research. They also require critical thinking skills to analyze and interpret historical evidence accurately. Additionally, knowledge of historiography, research methods, and relevant theories are essential tools for historians.
The writings of contemporary historians.
i think, they will study what we did in life
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
It is the current working theory of the origin of the universe. It is the paradigm that Astronomy is based upon. But, new evidence is always being described. The theory itself might change as our knowledge grows.
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
Historians look for evidence about the distant past in myths and legends because myths and legends tell what people believed and understood. Historians study by looking at journals, data, diaries etc., to learn information.
Historians use the evidence they find to analyze and interpret the past, draw conclusions, and form historical narratives. They evaluate the reliability and significance of the evidence to construct well-grounded arguments about historical events and trends. Critical thinking and interpretation are essential skills historians utilize to make sense of the past based on the information available.