Knights fought for their land and nobles before the king was considered and only when the king paid them would they then fight for him
Feudalism was a type of manoralism of the Middle Ages, but with the additional twist that the central government was weak and required a hierarchy of nobility to provide stability on the local level.
The feudal system was meant to help organize things for people (to help people). How it worked: What happened was that the king was at the top, and then the nobles were given land that was split up so they couldn't start a rebellion and the nobles gave their land to lots of knights which gave thier land to lots of peasants which farmed the land and paid taxes. The knights fought, and the king gave the noble more land so that he was richer. More land=richer you are! This kind of system was based on kept promises. If some promises were not kept, the entire system fails. For example, if a king gives 12 lords land to have in return for service, the lord promises to give the king knights to protect him. But if only 6 lords keep the promise, then the king isn't as well-protected and therefore has a chance to die.
The feudal system was meant to help organize things for people.( To help people) how it worked: what happened was that the king was at the top and then the nobles were given land that was split up so they couldn't start a rebellion and the nobles gave their land to lots of knights which gave there land to lots of peasants which farmed the land and paid taxes. the knights fought and the king gave the noble more land so that he was richer more land=richer you are! this kind of system was based on kept promises. if some promises were not kept the entire system fails. Therefore I think that the Feudal System isn't fair especially for the peasants.
The economy of Europe was agricultural through the entire Middle Ages. The nobility controlled most of the land, and so they controlled most of the means of production of the economy. The peasants, most of whom lived on the land the nobles controlled, paid rent and provided services in exchange for their places to live and fields to work. So the nobles derived their wealth indirectly from farming.
Knights fought for their land and nobles before the king was considered and only when the king paid them would they then fight for him
Feudalism was a type of manoralism of the Middle Ages, but with the additional twist that the central government was weak and required a hierarchy of nobility to provide stability on the local level.
The feudal system was meant to help organize things for people (to help people). How it worked: What happened was that the king was at the top, and then the nobles were given land that was split up so they couldn't start a rebellion and the nobles gave their land to lots of knights which gave thier land to lots of peasants which farmed the land and paid taxes. The knights fought, and the king gave the noble more land so that he was richer. More land=richer you are! This kind of system was based on kept promises. If some promises were not kept, the entire system fails. For example, if a king gives 12 lords land to have in return for service, the lord promises to give the king knights to protect him. But if only 6 lords keep the promise, then the king isn't as well-protected and therefore has a chance to die.
The feudal system was meant to help organize things for people (to help people). How it worked: What happened was that the king was at the top, and then the nobles were given land that was split up so they couldn't start a rebellion and the nobles gave their land to lots of knights which gave thier land to lots of peasants which farmed the land and paid taxes. The knights fought, and the king gave the noble more land so that he was richer. More land=richer you are! This kind of system was based on kept promises. If some promises were not kept, the entire system fails. For example, if a king gives 12 lords land to have in return for service, the lord promises to give the king knights to protect him. But if only 6 lords keep the promise, then the king isn't as well-protected and therefore has a chance to die.
The feudal system was meant to help organize things for people.( To help people) how it worked: what happened was that the king was at the top and then the nobles were given land that was split up so they couldn't start a rebellion and the nobles gave their land to lots of knights which gave there land to lots of peasants which farmed the land and paid taxes. the knights fought and the king gave the noble more land so that he was richer more land=richer you are! this kind of system was based on kept promises. if some promises were not kept the entire system fails. Therefore I think that the Feudal System isn't fair especially for the peasants.
YES
The economy of Europe was agricultural through the entire Middle Ages. The nobility controlled most of the land, and so they controlled most of the means of production of the economy. The peasants, most of whom lived on the land the nobles controlled, paid rent and provided services in exchange for their places to live and fields to work. So the nobles derived their wealth indirectly from farming.
the nobles received their money from the taxes that the third estate paid.
Kings began to support the new towns in exchange for money. They agreed to protect towns and made laws to help towns grow rich. Then, with the money paid by townspeople, kings hired armies and used them to attack troublesome nobles.
The feudal system during the Rajput period was characterized by a hierarchical structure where land was granted in exchange for military service and loyalty. Kings, or Rajputs, ruled over territories and distributed land to nobles and warriors, who in return provided protection and supported the king in battles. This system fostered a strong sense of loyalty and duty among the Rajput clans, leading to a society organized around martial values and local governance. Additionally, peasants worked the land and paid taxes, supporting the feudal lords and the ruling class.
With honor.
$15 million because napolean didn't really want the land anymore- so he took the money in exchange for the land