This question refers to the final post-war disposition of partitioned Germany by the World War II Allied victors. Initially the Soviet Union, France and other countries were opposed unification based on specter of repeated German ascendancies to dominating Europe. Ultimately compromise was reached and the border questions and issues of German rearmament were reached allowing for Germany being reunited. That being said Germany lands such as Danzig (Gdansk, Poland) and Koenigsberg (Kalinigrad, Russia) have not been return or reunited.
was a political movement that worked for the unification of Italy
Major European powers fought to keep independent states from unifying
The brain of Italian unification is often attributed to Count Camillo di Cavour, the Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Sardinia. Cavour was a skilled statesman and diplomat who played a crucial role in orchestrating the political and military strategies that led to the unification of Italy. He worked closely with figures like Giuseppe Garibaldi and King Victor Emmanuel II to achieve the unification of various Italian states into a single nation by 1871.
yes he did after his mother died he moved to Vienna and took menial jobs like working in a library. he sold the paintings he done when he could. In 1914 when the first world war started he volunteered for service and was accepted into the 16th bavarian reserve infantry regiment.
Boniface worked in Germany in the mid 8th century. He was martyred in the year 754.
Major European powers fought to keep independent states from unifying
Unification refers to the process of bringing things together to form a whole. For example, the government worked on a plan to promote unification among the different communities in the country.
was a political movement that worked for the unification of Italy
Major European powers fought to keep independent states from unifying
One advantage Germany had over Italy during their respective unification processes was its more centralized and cohesive political structure. The German states were more interconnected through the Zollverein, a customs union that fostered economic cooperation and laid the groundwork for political unity. Additionally, Germany benefited from strong leadership figures like Otto von Bismarck, who adeptly used diplomacy and military strategy to unify the German states. In contrast, Italy faced greater regional divisions and lacked a singular, effective leadership figure during its unification efforts.
Garibaldi's forces worked towards the unification of Italy to create a single, unified nation out of the numerous independent states that existed at the time. They fought against various opposing forces, including Austrian and French troops, to achieve this goal.
He worked as the Chancellor of Germany.
He worked as the Chancellor of Germany.
The brain of Italian unification is often attributed to Count Camillo di Cavour, the Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Sardinia. Cavour was a skilled statesman and diplomat who played a crucial role in orchestrating the political and military strategies that led to the unification of Italy. He worked closely with figures like Giuseppe Garibaldi and King Victor Emmanuel II to achieve the unification of various Italian states into a single nation by 1871.
the chinesebelief the mandate of heaven have worked for and against stability in the government because they can
yes he did after his mother died he moved to Vienna and took menial jobs like working in a library. he sold the paintings he done when he could. In 1914 when the first world war started he volunteered for service and was accepted into the 16th bavarian reserve infantry regiment.
One can not solely claim that Otto Von Bismarck brought about German unification. It was a number of factors which worked in his favor. For example, the Zollverein was an effective economic force in unifying some of the disgruntled southern states with Prussia. But in relation to Bismarck 'single-handedly' achieving German Unification, one could state that he did so pragmatically, in such events as the annexation of Luxembourg, which caused an upsurge in nationalism and anti-french feeling throughout Germany, this allowed him to have a huge military budget passed and gave him the ample opportunity to defeat Napoleon II. One could not just argue that Bismarck single-handedly achieved German unification, it was brought about through 'blood and iron' and not 'coal and iron' as Keynes later argues. Pragmatic actions coupled with the superiority of the free trading Zollverein under the helm of Von Roon. It should also be noted that Bismarck never planned full German Unification, a key primary source that concludes this can be found in a letter to his wife, which reads 'There is nothing left to achieve in our lifetime'. But evidently the military pacts Prussia had made with southern states on the eve of warfare meant that if warfare broke out, Prussia would have political dominance over those states. Nationalism within Germany at the time can not be credited as a significant factor in German unification. Numbers within nationalist groups were always relatively low, and it is important not to confuse nationalism with patriotism. Thus concluding this short response. It was pragmatic Bismarck actions that brought about German unification, but Germany was certainly not unified by Bismarck 'single-handedly'.