The Virginia London Company, also known as the Virginia Company, promised the colonists several guarantees, including the protection of their rights as English subjects, the right to govern themselves through a representative assembly, and the potential for land ownership. They also offered the hope of wealth through the discovery of gold and other resources. Additionally, the company assured colonists that they would receive provisions and support to help establish the new settlement. However, many of these promises were not fully realized, leading to significant challenges for the colonists.
In the 1600s, Virginia attracted many colonists primarily due to the promise of economic opportunity, particularly through tobacco cultivation, which became a highly profitable cash crop. The Virginia Company offered incentives such as land grants and the headright system, which encouraged settlers to come and establish farms. Additionally, the allure of social mobility and the chance to improve one's status drew many individuals seeking a better life in the New World. The availability of resources and the potential for wealth further fueled the migration to Virginia during this period.
The Declaration of Independence only declared the independence of the American colonists from Britain, so yes, they did meet that promise. I think you are thinking of the Constitution.
mayflower compact
English colonists believed they would quickly grow rich in Virginia due to the discovery of valuable resources, particularly tobacco, which was in high demand in Europe. The promise of fertile land and the potential for profitable plantations fueled their optimism. Additionally, the success of early settlers who managed to profit from these resources created a perception that wealth was easily attainable in the New World. The prevailing belief in the availability of untapped natural resources further encouraged this expectation.
the answer to this particular answer is C: A promise of a bill of rights to follow.
a system of land grants
Gold :)
People are going to have different points of view. Generally, it's going to be seen as unethical for a company to promise benefits, and then walk away from the promise years later.
3
the redcoats were hated because the king had closed the port of Boston and had been selling redcoats or as there also known as lobsterbacks. also because they had been in war together and they made a promise and the king broke the promise.
The Declaration of Independence only declared the independence of the American colonists from Britain, so yes, they did meet that promise. I think you are thinking of the Constitution.
mayflower compact
A promise of Bill of Rights to follow. :)
Any person or company who has not honored it's promise.
Since "The Company" is asking nothing illegal from its employees in making such a request, there is nothing illegal involved by virtue of their request. What the officials of any company promise to employees is just a promise; and, things change. When it is no longer considered to be of benefit to a company to support such promises, revisions are made. In addressing these issues, it is not morality that is at stake--- it's business; and, there are a lot of things that may be "wrong" for a company to do that are in no way illegal. As far as the company asking the employees to avoid doing something which otherwise would be in the employees' interests to do, that's not illegal. If company policy provided you with "benefit-X" upon request, and the company decides to revise their benefits package to eliminate that option, there's nothing illegal about it--- regardless the reason the company might have for doing so. When it involves something like a 401-K plan, the details are a bit more intricate; but, there are never any "guarantees" for an employee that are not written in a black-and-white contract and/or supported by solid legislation. In the employment arena, the employer has the upper hand in most regards; and, it is best to remember one thing as you watch jobs and pensions and benefits packages evaporate around you this year: A promise is a promise is a promise, regardless of age...
Moyers and Company - 2012 The Sandy Hook Promise 2-17 was released on: USA: 5 May 2013
the answer to this particular answer is C: A promise of a bill of rights to follow.