answersLogoWhite

0

Governments reserve the right to suppress an individual's freedom of movement in several instances, including during states of emergency or public health crises, such as pandemics, when quarantines or travel restrictions may be imposed to protect public safety. Additionally, individuals may be restricted from movement due to legal reasons, such as being subject to probation, parole, or court orders. National security concerns, such as preventing terrorism or protecting sensitive areas, can also justify limitations on movement.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

Why was mbuya nehanda killed?

Mbuya Nehanda, a prominent figure in the First Chimurenga (the Zimbabwean War of Independence) against British colonial rule, was executed by the colonial government in 1901 for her role in leading resistance against colonial oppression. She was considered a spiritual leader and a symbol of the fight for freedom. Her execution was intended to suppress the nationalist movement, but instead, it solidified her status as a martyr and an enduring symbol of resistance in Zimbabwean history.


Why do we have the first amendment?

The first amendment (known as the Bill of Rights) was a compromise between Federalist states and Anti-Federalist states, therefore allowing the new Constitution to be passed. Anti-Federalist wanted rights and restrictions to be put on the Constitution because there was no guarantee to them. Federalists argued that the rights listed were implied. Obviously the Anti-Federalists got what they wanted.


According to those who opposed it what was wrong with the Sedition of 1918?

It limited freedom of speech


What was the role of language in the freedom movement of India?

Yes afcourse the indian freedom fighter was a good


What were the features of rowlatt act?

The Rowlatt Act, enacted in 1919 by the British colonial government in India, aimed to curtail civil liberties in response to growing nationalist movements. Key features included the extension of wartime emergency measures, allowing for the arrest and detention of individuals without trial and the restriction of freedom of speech and assembly. It also empowered the government to suppress protests and dissent, leading to widespread unrest and the eventual Jallianwala Bagh massacre. The act was met with significant opposition and contributed to the rise of the Indian independence movement.

Related Questions

What is considered a human rights violation by a government?

When a Government imposes restriction on the free movement,freedom of expression of its citizens, these will definitely be considered as human rights violation by the Government.


Do the people of Russia have the freedom of speech?

Russia elects its leaders democratically and the current (2009) government is certainly a popular, legitimate government. However, at present it appears (from the outside) that the government/authorities seem to suppress any dissenting public demonstrations and censer the press quite actively. On this basis one would have to conclude that, while the people of Russia have a democratic government, they do not have freedom of speech.


Who was considered as the last martyr of the freedom movement?

Bhagat Singh is considered one of the last martyrs of the Indian freedom movement. He was executed by the British colonial government in 1931 for his involvement in the struggle for India's independence. His sacrifice and bravery inspired generations of Indians in their fight for freedom.


When was Freedom Movement of Iran created?

Freedom Movement of Iran was created in 1961.


When did Chicago Freedom Movement happen?

Chicago Freedom Movement happened in 1967.


When was World Kashmir Freedom Movement created?

World Kashmir Freedom Movement was created in 1990.


When did National Socialist Freedom Movement end?

National Socialist Freedom Movement ended in 1925.


When was National Socialist Freedom Movement created?

National Socialist Freedom Movement was created in 1924.


How did the government react to the freedom charter?

The South African government reacted to the Freedom Charter, adopted in 1955 by the Congress of the People, with hostility and repression. They viewed it as a direct challenge to the apartheid regime and its policies of racial segregation and discrimination. In response, the government intensified its crackdown on anti-apartheid activists, leading to arrests, banning of organizations, and the enactment of stricter laws to suppress dissent. The Freedom Charter became a symbol of resistance and a pivotal document in the struggle for equality and justice in South Africa.


What is it called to have freedom to live where you choose?

freedom of movement


What has the author S Girija written?

S. Girija has written: 'Freedom movement in India' -- subject(s): History, Nationalism, Politics and government


Freedom to drive?

No. That was lost when we accepted the idea that the government had a right to require a license to drive. If the state has a right to license, then they have the right to withhold the privilege.