If everyone had a different national court system each state would get a different punishmentstate courts might interpret laws differently, no federal system of appeals
establish courts.
All of them. All states follow a three-tier system similar to the one used in the federal courts, but with names determined by the individual states.The three tiers help guarantee parties receive appropriate procedural due process:Trial Court (Federal: US District Courts)Intermediate Appellate (Federal: US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts)Final Appellate Court (Federal: Supreme Court of the United States)
What
Federal is more powerful than national. The national government is withheld inside the states where they prosecute minor crimes in their municipal courts. The federal union overpowers the national union when crimes are done to fellow federal buildings or persons or major crimes. The federal court will always have jurisdiction over state courts. Federal lawyers are more expensive than national lawyers.
False
The Judiciary Act of 1789
A discussion of the pros and cons of having a dual court system instead of one unified national court system.
A weakness of the Articles of Confederation
True
True
A weakness of the Articles of Confederation
No, the Articles of Confederation did not have a national court system. Moreover, under the Articles of Confederation, the Congress had limited power to regulate trade.
(in the U.S.) that would be a reference to the Federal Court System (e.g.: US District Courts - US Courts of Appeal - The Supreme Court of the US - etc).
the federal courts are part of a legal system that includes all the courts and laws in the U.S
a bureaucracy, system of national laws, courts, military and taxes system
National Center for State Courts was created in 1971.