Equitable doctrine refers to a set of legal principles that govern fairness and justice in the resolution of disputes, often applied when strict application of the law would lead to unjust outcomes. These doctrines, such as promissory estoppel or equitable estoppel, allow courts to consider circumstances beyond rigid legal rules to achieve a fair result. Equitable remedies, like injunctions or specific performance, can also be granted when monetary damages are inadequate. Overall, equitable doctrine aims to promote fairness in legal proceedings.
The doctrine of equitable restitution is a legal principle that allows a party to recover benefits conferred upon another when it would be unjust for the recipient to retain those benefits without compensating the provider. This doctrine is often applied in cases where no formal contract exists, or when a contract is unenforceable. Equitable restitution aims to prevent unjust enrichment, ensuring that one party does not unfairly benefit at the expense of another. Courts may impose this remedy to achieve fairness and uphold justice in various situations.
I think Federal character is a doctrine or principle which ensures equitable allocation of the nations resources and also equitable representation of citizens of a country in a political, economic or social positions within the country so that no section or segment of the countries population is marginalized or oppressed. This is a basic feature of federalism or federal system of government.
The moraine doctrine, which pertains to the legal principles governing the allocation of water rights and the use of water resources, was developed by the legal scholar and water rights expert Joseph L. Sax. His influential work in the 1970s helped shape contemporary understanding of water law in the United States, particularly regarding the public trust doctrine and environmental protection. Sax's writings emphasize the need for sustainable and equitable management of water resources.
Rochdale Society of Equitable Pioneers ended in 1991.
There is no such doctrine. Perhaps you're looking for the Monroe Doctrine.
It is a common law doctrine in england.
The First Bank of the US was based on: "The Doctrine of Equitable Subrogation."
George Serrell has written: 'The equitable doctrine of election'
The doctrine of equitable restitution is a legal principle that allows a party to recover benefits conferred upon another when it would be unjust for the recipient to retain those benefits without compensating the provider. This doctrine is often applied in cases where no formal contract exists, or when a contract is unenforceable. Equitable restitution aims to prevent unjust enrichment, ensuring that one party does not unfairly benefit at the expense of another. Courts may impose this remedy to achieve fairness and uphold justice in various situations.
I am pretty sure that is an assignment question, and you are very lazy. Go research it yourself.
Unclean hands, sometimes clean hands doctrine or dirty hands doctrine is an equitable defense in which the defendant argues that the plaintiff is not entitled to obtain an equitable remedy on account of the fact that the plaintiff is acting unethically or has acted in bad faith with respect to the subject of the complaint-that is, with "unclean hands".
In most states, under the doctrine of "Election", the wife could file a claim in the husband's estate and receive a share of the value of the property. It is unclear what you mean by joint equitable owners.
I think Federal character is a doctrine or principle which ensures equitable allocation of the nations resources and also equitable representation of citizens of a country in a political, economic or social positions within the country so that no section or segment of the countries population is marginalized or oppressed. This is a basic feature of federalism or federal system of government.
Legal interest - n.(in land law) A right in or over land. It may comprise equitable ownership of the land (such as the interest of the tenant for life under a settlement), where the legal estate is owned by trustees; or the benefit of some other right over the land of another, such as an easement or rentcharge. Interests of the latter type can be legal or equitable, but under the Law of Property Act 1925 only interests owned on terms equivalent to a fee simple absolute in possession or a term of years absolute qualify as legal interests. A person interested in land is one who has rights in it. See also equitable interests.equitable interests - Interests in property originally recognized by the Court of Chancery, as distinct from legal interests recognized in the common-law courts. They arose in cases when it was against the principles of equity for a person to enforce a legal right. Originally equitable rights (e.g. a trust, or the equity of redemption under a mortgage) were enforceable against the person with a legal right over property in question. Later, however, those who were given the property by the holder of the legal interests took it subject to equitable interests; later still, anyone who bought property knowing of the equitable interests was bound by them. In the developed law, everyone took property subject to equitable interests except those who bought it and neither knew nor ought to have known of the equitable interests (the doctrine of notice). Since 1925, equitable interests may be protected by the doctrine of overreaching, under the system of land charges, or by notice.equitable interest An interest in, or ownership of, property that is recognized by equity but not by the common law. A beneficiary under a trust has an equitable interest. Any disposal of an equitable interest (e.g. a sale) must be in writing. Some equitable interests in land must be registered or they will be lost
No, laws are not procedural or equitable
Palais Equitable was created in 1891.
Scottish Equitable was created in 1831.