0
Archaeological evidence is not just a stele, piece of pottery or foundation of an ancient building. It is also provenance, context and analysis.
Provenance includes evidence of the exact location where a find was made, with its removal preferably witnessed by reliable persons. This is particularly important for Near Eastern finds, because of the potential monetary value and the opportunity for religiously inspired misrepresentation. Knowing the exact location of the find enables archaeologists to place it in context with other finds in terms of age and influence. Much more can be ascertained by looking at sherds of pottery in situ than by looking at the same material displayed in a museum.
Analysis can include carbon dating, microscopic, ultra-morphological, chemical, mineralogical or microbiological analysis. Paleographers can date the letters in an inscription by their shape, while language experts can provide an opinion on whether the language is appropriate for the time at which the object is otherwise dated.
The flip side of archaeological evidence is archaeological fraud. Professor Eric Meyers of Duke University said, "Estimates are running as high as 30 or 40 percent of all inscribed materials in the Israel Museum [in Jerusalem] have been forged."
What else can I help you with?
What is the difference between a historical source and a historical evidence?
A historical source is an original document or artifact created during the time being studied, such as letters, photographs, or official records. In contrast, historical evidence refers to the information derived from these sources, which historians use to support their interpretations and conclusions about the past. While sources provide the raw materials for historical inquiry, evidence is the analysis and contextual understanding derived from those sources. Essentially, sources are the "what," and evidence is the "how" and "why" that inform our understanding of history.
Can you give me an example sentence with the word historical?
historical evidence suggests this theory. The war was Historical.
Why did the croatan Indians kill the the colonists of the lost colony?
It isn’t sure they did. In fact, new historical evidence points to the possibility that they lived with them. They had a village down river from the colony and recent historical evidence has found English items in the village and evidence they were living with them.
What is a sentence for the word historical?
These historical documents are of extreme importance.This is a historical site.
Why was Marie Antoinette so mean?
There is no historical evidence that she was mean spirited.
Which is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history?
Corroborated sources of historical evidence. (APEX) !/
What is the historical evidance for the foundation of rome?
what is the historical evidence for the foundation of rome
What is an historical evidence?
Historical evidence refers to any physical or written proof that validates events or people from the past. This evidence can include artifacts, documents, inscriptions, or other tangible items that provide insight into historical events or cultures. It is crucial for historians and researchers to analyze historical evidence to construct accurate narratives of the past.
What factors can change a historical interpretation?
Evidence, secondary sources, and forgery. :)
What describes a historical argument?
A historical argument presents a claim based on evidence from historical sources and research. It aims to explain and interpret past events, often analyzing the causes and consequences of historical events or developments. Effective historical arguments are supported by strong evidence and critical analysis.
Marie Antoinette and her selfishness?
There is no historical evidence of that nature.
Which method separates modern historians from ancient Greek historians?
Basing historical accounts on reliable evidence
What does historical synthesis mean?
Historical synthesis is the process an historian engages in to transform evidence into a final historical account (O'Brien, 1935)
When did navel piercing start?
There is no direct evidence of historical navel piercing, although there is a great deal of historical evidence regarding the decoration of the navel, both for ritual and aesthetic purposes.
What was Socrates pet?
There is no historical evidence to suggest that Socrates had a pet.
Can you give me an example sentence with the word historical?
historical evidence suggests this theory. The war was Historical.
Which historical term describes the specific primary and secondary sources that historians use to support their claims?
Historical evidence.
