0
A historical source is an original document or artifact created during the time being studied, such as letters, photographs, or official records. In contrast, historical evidence refers to the information derived from these sources, which historians use to support their interpretations and conclusions about the past. While sources provide the raw materials for historical inquiry, evidence is the analysis and contextual understanding derived from those sources. Essentially, sources are the "what," and evidence is the "how" and "why" that inform our understanding of history.
What else can I help you with?
How reliable is film as a source of historical evidence?
The use of film in the pursuit of historical truth is a much debated topic and only recently has become a major medium in the way people perceive the past. The general idea behind historical films is to get the historical facts out to the public, but also to entertain and it is the balance between these two that causes much dilemma in the debate between historians and film makers. The balance is sometimes tipped towards the historians, and the film becomes a drab and boring documentary that doesn't appeal to the general public. If the film is tipped towards the filmmakers, we get an entertaining storyline and special effects, but lots of historical inaccuracies. This appeals to the general public and generates more revenue, which is why it is more common practice. This being said, film is not a very reliable source for historical evidence as it is most likely plagued with inaccuracies and anachronisms.
What do you call a piece of historical information from a person who was actually at an event such as antonio pigafettas journal?
A piece of historical information from a person who was actually at an event is called a primary source. Primary sources provide firsthand accounts or direct evidence about a historical topic, such as journals, letters, photographs, or official documents. Antonio Pigafetta's journal is a prime example of a primary source, offering insight into his experiences during Ferdinand Magellan's expedition.
What is historical sources?
A historical source can be anything. A letter, diary, painting, newspaper, anything.
Jefferson's Declaration of Independence is a secondary source.?
No, it's a primary source historical document.
Is a second hand source reliable?
Historians will examine a second hand source of a historical event. If the second hand source matches up to other sources of information, then each source in a certain manner adds to the credibility of the historical event.
Read the following passages. Each source is related to the 1858 debates between Stephen A. Douglas and Abraham Lincoln for a seat in the US Senate. Which of the following describes a difference betwee?
Source 1 is a secondary source, while source 2 is a primary source
Which is the best source of historical evidence to learn about how an event unfolded?
google.com
What is the difference between a primary source and a artifact?
What is the difference between a primary source and an artifact? a. Primary sources are studied by archaeologists; artifacts are studied by historians. ... Primary sources are written sources; artifacts are objects.
Example of historical context?
Example of historical evidence would be anything that was dug up from history. A primary source.
Which type of historical evidence is a newspaper article written immediately after the great Chicago fire?
Primary source
The Declaration of Independence a primary source or a secondary source of historical information relating to American independence?
When researching American independence or almost any founding-period subject, the Declaration of Independence is indeed a primary source. The difference between primary sources and secondary sources hinges on this simple distinction: a primary source is (or was) "there", while a secondary source is (or was) not "there" but instead talks "about" it.
Would letters and diaries of soldiers always be accurate historical evidence?
Yes, because letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered what is called a primary source. A primary source is a document or artefact created at the time of the event. This means that letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered accurate historical evidence.
What are the differences between Emitter follower and source follower?
no difference between emiter follower and source follower
What step must a historian take to evaluate historical evidence?
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
What is the difference between a rectangular pyramid and a secondary source?
math
What is the difference between source and evidence?
Sources may be someone's personal viewpoint of what happened, and may be made up by the person.Evidence expresses facts about the past - meaning what really happened; the truth; the reality of an event, situation or person.
What is the difference between money and education?
Mony is power money is source of survivel source of fame
