Feudalism flourished between the tenth and thirteenth centuries in Western Europe. At its core, it was an agreement between a lord and a vassal. A person became a vassal by pledging political allegiance and providing military, political, and financial service to a lord. A lord possessed complete sovereignty over land, or acted in the service of another sovereign, usually a king. If a lord acted in the service of a king, the lord was considered a vassal of the king.
As part of the feudal agreement, the lord promised to protect the vassal and provided the vassal with a plot of land. This land could be passed on to the vassal's heirs, giving the vassal tenure over the land. The vassal was also vested with the power to lease the land to others for profit, a practice known as subinfeudation. The entire agreement was called a fief, and a lord's collection of fiefs was called a fiefdom.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Feudal+monarchy
While feudalism is the ruling of many feudal lords over one area competing with one annother. Feudal lords run down the family aswell as kings/queens of a Monarch civilization.
Answer: Both families of the two types of govenrment god down the family tree. Son to Son so to speak.
A high value of military skills and loyalty.
One similarity is that both the Mauryan and the Gupta empires collapsed. One difference between the two are that the Mauryan's had a complex government, the Gupta's did not.
Under the Tokugawa Shogunate the Emperor acted as a figurehead and Shoguns ruled regions much like Feudal Europe with Kings as figureheads and Regions ruled by Earls and such.
asian
i dont know and i dont care :D
A high value of military skills and loyalty.
A similarity between a Sahel and the savannah is it gets rainfall :)
There is a similarity between the theories.The twins had just one similarity.
There isn't one.
One similarity is that both the Mauryan and the Gupta empires collapsed. One difference between the two are that the Mauryan's had a complex government, the Gupta's did not.
One similarity is that both the Mauryan and the Gupta empires collapsed. One difference between the two are that the Mauryan's had a complex government, the Gupta's did not.
One similarity is that both the Mauryan and the Gupta empires collapsed. One difference between the two are that the Mauryan's had a complex government, the Gupta's did not.
One similarity is that both the Mauryan and the Gupta empires collapsed
hunting
They have the same religions
They have the same religions
They have the same religions