When it has been gathered in accordance with the law and presented to the court in such a way as to represent the party who presents it to their best advantage.
to determine if there is sufficient evidence to formally charge the defendant / suspect.
Never. There is a story that IBM declared something like this in the early 1950s, but there is no evidence for it.
The Australopithecines did not have religion or ceremonies. The earliest evidence for brain development sufficient to allow symbolic behaviour and these kind of behaviours is associated with Neanderthal which appeared 600,000 years after the last Australopithecines disappeared.
(in the US) A Grand Jury hears the details of the offense, and the evidence that leads the police to believe that a particular individual committed it. They then vote on whether they believe sufficient PROBABLE CAUSE exists to charge the defendant.
enough/meets requirement
Have you had sufficient to eat? The police did not have sufficient evidence to prosecute.
Evidence which is not sufficient to prove a contention to the standard required is inadequate.
It's evidence where sufficient background is required to understand the laws of nature.
The evidence may not be sufficient to convict the suspect in the case.
We do not have sufficient evidence to prove wether he is or isn't :/
The evidence provided was sufficient to support the conclusion.
No, an IP address alone is not sufficient evidence to convict someone of a crime. Additional evidence is typically needed to establish a connection between the IP address and the individual responsible for the crime.
Yes, trespassing is a crime, and if there is sufficient evidence you did it, you will be convicted.
All of these. There was sufficient evidence to sustain consecutive sentences, a jury could find the messatges to cause mental distress and that there was sufficient evidence to sustain maximum sentences.
It means that there is enough evidence to lead a "reasonable person" to believe that there is sufficient evidence to supports the facts that are in in dispute.
Probable cause.
Sufficient probable cause and evidence to place the defendant inside the location which was burglarized.