There are two viable answers:
Jordan: In 1970/1971 The P.L.O actually tried to overthrow King Hussein of Jordan. This bought about a war in Jordan (called Black September) that ended with the P.L.O being expelled from that country and 15,000 Palestinian deaths.
Lebanon: The Lebanese Civil War began in 1975 as the PLO had turned Southern Lebanon into its own micro-country and repressed the endemic Shiite Lebanese population. This Palestinian violence towards the Lebanese Shiites was one of many reasons why the Lebanese Civil War (1975-1991) broke out.
well my family sort of drifts apart when we had a computer so it would probably cause conflicts in a family I'm just saying from experience
The Cold War differed from past conflicts primarily in its ideological nature, being a struggle between capitalism and communism rather than a direct military confrontation between nations. Instead of traditional warfare, it involved proxy wars, nuclear arms races, and intense political and economic rivalry, emphasizing psychological and propaganda battles. Additionally, the global scale of the Cold War, influencing countries worldwide, set it apart from earlier regional conflicts. This multifaceted approach made it a unique and prolonged period of tension without direct large-scale combat between the superpowers.
73 miles apart
because they fell apart
The action or state of setting someone or something apart from other people or things or being set apart.
Earth, Wind & Fire did a popular cover version in the late 1970s. me in da showerr duhhh:)
MERITS 1. Conflicts can produce better understanding of both issues and people. 2. Conflicts can produce better decisions. 3. Conflicts can produce greater cohesiveness among members in a group. 4. Conflicts can stimulate involvement and increase motivation. DEMERITS 1. Conflicts can cause bad feeling among group members. 2. Conflicts can split a group apart. 3. Conflicts can also delay decisions and retard group progress. 4. Conflicts can can involve personal attack.
The major conflicts occurring in the book are the struggle for Okonkwo to achieve his ambitions, and the struggle of the Igbo to properly deal with the colonists and their religion.
The nation breaking apart can be attributed to events like political divisions, economic disparities, cultural differences, and social upheaval. These factors can lead to tensions and conflicts, eventually resulting in the fragmentation of a nation.
The British were afraid of losing control of their colonies, if they became too spread out.
Apart from conflicts between Britain and France there were a few internal rebellions - 1837, 1870, 1885, and doubtless other local outbreaks.
well my family sort of drifts apart when we had a computer so it would probably cause conflicts in a family I'm just saying from experience
Norway is involved in Afghanistan, although I believe they are pulling out. Apart from being a part of the UN Peace Corps, Norway really isn't that keen on being involved in armed conflicts.
Internal conflicts in Fever 1793 include protagonist Matilda's struggle to adapt to the changing circumstances caused by the yellow fever epidemic and her desire for independence. External conflicts arise from the epidemic itself, such as the danger and chaos in the city, the impact on the characters' relationships, and their fight for survival.
The point of view makes it seem like a neutral narrator is explaining the conflicts between the cultures without being emotionally involved.
The climax of "The Eve of St. Agnes" occurs when Madeline and Porphyro are reunited and escape from her family's castle. This moment marks the pinnacle of their love and the resolution of the conflicts that have kept them apart.
Yes, "breaking apart" is the progressive form of the particle verb "break apart". E.g., "He is breaking apart the rocks" or "The rocks are breaking apart".