In Act IV Scene 3 of Julius Caesar, a Poet enters to break up the argument between Brutus and Cassius, which is pointless because they have reconciled themselves without his help. Since the Poet has three short lines, and the scene accomplishes nothing, a lot of directors would simply cut his part and move on to Lucilius and Titinius.
Brutus and Cassius delivered speech to convince the roman mob and give proper reasons for Caesar's death. Then Mark Antony delivered his funeral speech where he succeeded to influence the mindset of the fickle-minded mob in his favour. They began considering Julius Caesar to be the noblest man in Rome. They ran into rage against the conspirators. Brutus and Cassius were driven out of the Gates of Rome and Cinna the poet was killed when the mob punished him for a matching name with Cinna the Conspirator. The armies of 'Brutus and Cassius' and 'Antony and Octabius' geared to fight each other.
the poet
Marullus and Flavius-the Tribunes Gnaeus Pompey. Sextus Pompey. Julius Caesar. Portia- Brutus' wife. Cinna-the poet. Cinna-the conspirator. Young Cato-son of Marcus Cato. Caius Cassius. Marcus Brutus.
Cinna the conspirator and Cinna the poet are different people! Cinna the conspirator was named Lucius Cornelius Cinna. He was conspirator against Caesar, who plays a key role in enlisting Brutus to their cause. Cinna the poet was named Gaius Helvius Cinna, an influential poet of the time who was killed after Julius Caesar's death. Many plebeians, in their rage after joining Antony, killed him because, though he claimed he wasn't Cinna the conspirator, he shared the name.
The poet advised Brutus and Cassius to not let their anger and envy cloud their judgment and lead them into making hasty decisions in the pursuit of power. They were cautioned to maintain their honor and nobility in the face of adversity.
If you are talking about the play Brutus Caesar Cassius Cinna the Poet The conspirators
In Act IV Scene 3 of Julius Caesar, a Poet enters to break up the argument between Brutus and Cassius, which is pointless because they have reconciled themselves without his help. Since the Poet has three short lines, and the scene accomplishes nothing, a lot of directors would simply cut his part and move on to Lucilius and Titinius.
Since Antony intended to seize power for himself, he was most eager to destroy the leaders of the conspiracy. The leaders are, of course, Brutus and Cassius. Unfortunately the riot he causes only does in poor old Cinna the poet.
the poet
Brutus and Cassius delivered speech to convince the roman mob and give proper reasons for Caesar's death. Then Mark Antony delivered his funeral speech where he succeeded to influence the mindset of the fickle-minded mob in his favour. They began considering Julius Caesar to be the noblest man in Rome. They ran into rage against the conspirators. Brutus and Cassius were driven out of the Gates of Rome and Cinna the poet was killed when the mob punished him for a matching name with Cinna the Conspirator. The armies of 'Brutus and Cassius' and 'Antony and Octabius' geared to fight each other.
Marullus and Flavius-the Tribunes Gnaeus Pompey. Sextus Pompey. Julius Caesar. Portia- Brutus' wife. Cinna-the poet. Cinna-the conspirator. Young Cato-son of Marcus Cato. Caius Cassius. Marcus Brutus.
The citizens start to hate Brutus and Cassius for murdering Caesar. Antony mentions in his speech basically that Caesar cared for the poor and cried for and with them. Because of this, Brutus and Cassius go running for the gates of Rome to save themselves.
A 'poet laureate' is a title by appointment given to a poet by the British sovereign to compose verse for state ceremonies.
The poem entitled "How Things Work" is addressed to the poet's daughter. Throughout the poem, the speaker imparts advice and wisdom to their daughter about navigating life's challenges and finding beauty in the world.
I would say a poet
Antony was appealing to the emotions of the mob; Brutus was appealing to their intelligence. Antony knew that the kind of rabble-rousing he had in mind would be effective in making them do crazy things (like killing Cinna the poet), and allowing him to eventually become dictator. Politically, it works; it succeeded in doing all that Antony wanted. But does that make it better? Brutus's argument was more intellectually satisfying, more grounded in morality and good governance. It was less effective but more right.